From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
mhocko@suse.com, apopple@nvidia.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
will@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
mark.rutland@arm.com, hughd@google.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, peterx@redhat.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, jglisse@google.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/2] Do not shatter hugezeropage on wp-fault
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:47:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241008061746.285961-1-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)
It was observed at [1] and [2] that the current kernel behaviour of
shattering a hugezeropage is inconsistent and suboptimal. For a VMA with
a THP allowable order, when we write-fault on it, the kernel installs a
PMD-mapped THP. On the other hand, if we first get a read fault, we get
a PMD pointing to the hugezeropage; subsequent write will trigger a
write-protection fault, shattering the hugezeropage into one writable
page, and all the other PTEs write-protected. The conclusion being, as
compared to the case of a single write-fault, applications have to suffer
512 extra page faults if they were to use the VMA as such, plus we get
the overhead of khugepaged trying to replace that area with a THP anyway.
Instead, replace the hugezeropage with a THP on wp-fault.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3743d7e1-0b79-4eaf-82d5-d1ca29fe347d@arm.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1cfae0c0-96a2-4308-9c62-f7a640520242@arm.com/
The patchset has been rebased on the mm-unstable branch.
v6->v7: Align function parameters in the second line by two tabs
v5->v6:
- More goto ommissions, remove build warning for !CONFIG_NUMA
v4->v5:
- Directly return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK in case of !folio
v3->v4:
- Renames: pmd_thp_fault_alloc -> vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd,
map_pmd_thp -> map_anon_folio_pmd
- Instead of passing around, compute haddr at various places, similar
with gfp flags
- Pass haddr to update_mmu_cache_pmd() instead of unaligned address
- Do not pass vmf to map_anon_folio_pmd
- Do declarations in reverse xmas tree order
- Drop a new line which was introduced accidentally
- Call __pmd_thp_fault_success_stats from map_anon_folio_pmd
- Correctly return NULL from vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd
- Initialize pgtable to NULL in __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page, to
prevent freeing pgtable when not even allocated
- Drop if conditions from map_anon_folio_pmd, let the caller handle that
v2->v3:
- Drop foliop and order parameters, prefix the thp functions with pmd_
- First allocate THP, then pgtable, not vice-versa
- Move pgtable_trans_huge_deposit() from map_pmd_thp() to caller
- Drop exposing functions in include/linux/huge_mm.h
- Open code do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked()
- Release folio in case of pmd change after taking the lock, or
check_stable_address_space() returning VM_FAULT_SIGBUS
- Drop uffd-wp preservation. Looking at page_table_check_pmd_flags(),
preserving uffd-wp on a writable entry is invalid. Looking at
mfill_atomic(), uffd_copy() is a null operation when pmd is marked
uffd-wp.
v1->v2:
- Wrap do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked() around lock and unlock
- Call thp_fault_alloc() before do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked() to avoid
- calling sleeping function from spinlock context
Dev Jain (2):
mm: Abstract THP allocation
mm: Allocate THP on hugezeropage wp-fault
mm/huge_memory.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 6:17 Dev Jain [this message]
2024-10-08 6:17 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] mm: Abstract THP allocation Dev Jain
2024-10-08 6:17 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] mm: Allocate THP on hugezeropage wp-fault Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241008061746.285961-1-dev.jain@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).