linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	mhocko@suse.com, apopple@nvidia.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	will@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, hughd@google.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
	yang@os.amperecomputing.com, peterx@redhat.com,
	ioworker0@gmail.com, jglisse@google.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/2] Do not shatter hugezeropage on wp-fault
Date: Tue,  8 Oct 2024 11:47:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241008061746.285961-1-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)

It was observed at [1] and [2] that the current kernel behaviour of
shattering a hugezeropage is inconsistent and suboptimal. For a VMA with
a THP allowable order, when we write-fault on it, the kernel installs a
PMD-mapped THP. On the other hand, if we first get a read fault, we get
a PMD pointing to the hugezeropage; subsequent write will trigger a
write-protection fault, shattering the hugezeropage into one writable
page, and all the other PTEs write-protected. The conclusion being, as
compared to the case of a single write-fault, applications have to suffer
512 extra page faults if they were to use the VMA as such, plus we get
the overhead of khugepaged trying to replace that area with a THP anyway.

Instead, replace the hugezeropage with a THP on wp-fault.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3743d7e1-0b79-4eaf-82d5-d1ca29fe347d@arm.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1cfae0c0-96a2-4308-9c62-f7a640520242@arm.com/

The patchset has been rebased on the mm-unstable branch.

v6->v7: Align function parameters in the second line by two tabs

v5->v6:
 - More goto ommissions, remove build warning for !CONFIG_NUMA

v4->v5:
 - Directly return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK in case of !folio

v3->v4:
 - Renames: pmd_thp_fault_alloc -> vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd,
   map_pmd_thp -> map_anon_folio_pmd
 - Instead of passing around, compute haddr at various places, similar
   with gfp flags
 - Pass haddr to update_mmu_cache_pmd() instead of unaligned address
 - Do not pass vmf to map_anon_folio_pmd
 - Do declarations in reverse xmas tree order
 - Drop a new line which was introduced accidentally
 - Call __pmd_thp_fault_success_stats from map_anon_folio_pmd
 - Correctly return NULL from vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd
 - Initialize pgtable to NULL in __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page, to
   prevent freeing pgtable when not even allocated
 - Drop if conditions from map_anon_folio_pmd, let the caller handle that

v2->v3:
 - Drop foliop and order parameters, prefix the thp functions with pmd_
 - First allocate THP, then pgtable, not vice-versa
 - Move pgtable_trans_huge_deposit() from map_pmd_thp() to caller
 - Drop exposing functions in include/linux/huge_mm.h
 - Open code do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked()
 - Release folio in case of pmd change after taking the lock, or
   check_stable_address_space() returning VM_FAULT_SIGBUS
 - Drop uffd-wp preservation. Looking at page_table_check_pmd_flags(), 
   preserving uffd-wp on a writable entry is invalid. Looking at
   mfill_atomic(), uffd_copy() is a null operation when pmd is marked
   uffd-wp.

v1->v2:
 - Wrap do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked() around lock and unlock
 - Call thp_fault_alloc() before do_huge_zero_wp_pmd_locked() to avoid
 - calling sleeping function from spinlock context

Dev Jain (2):
  mm: Abstract THP allocation
  mm: Allocate THP on hugezeropage wp-fault

 mm/huge_memory.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2



             reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-08  6:17 Dev Jain [this message]
2024-10-08  6:17 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] mm: Abstract THP allocation Dev Jain
2024-10-08  6:17 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] mm: Allocate THP on hugezeropage wp-fault Dev Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241008061746.285961-1-dev.jain@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jglisse@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).