From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46A38D1627E for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:54:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Wi2WWnjEvwCiUPcVLezbBE3WShl1oRFXkSxBcV+PSv0=; b=0gugbwiK1U0+fF7rvM95oFlTcE OInjQTku/X39j5D6CWyb1Uw/N0m3LX8+MnjSbADTDmk2MchXSnSi/exqkBOf7GuttAfItScHi3eFg oWSxUFNpNDkvttGqbsmzyqPisvG/ivxOntrLaB7rFXVZIiiyh3bt9DLn3JzKMHoePevylBPy60zzP mc40FgtfhF7fUy3a8VJJWpWIclmGFn/ElwrSyoDisgJg1pb3mrzuKSpCq7VaV9mNwN9tTTNBybvPk by12Pzbycwdq20LK4/dzcbC0yNiUI0dAv0fj3YJXY2RyIPpRpN3di3WLISREtExhimg7TX+HYpXLB wC8rvG5g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t0MSU-00000005ZGj-1nBG; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:54:06 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t0LrZ-00000005RFT-3r81 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:16:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7FF5C4CC2; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CD9FC4CEC6; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:15:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1728915357; bh=JMs3GtAM/AP4Nk43zqLEi3kmlubpg35ct1yoyWyMJXw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z0KycE56otn3C3jY/iBFiLf55OqtAYwT3cUTbVoioqB0WAAfbVC2kRidZ4Z//cBr/ EYC2NeAoNz4JiLct3w4hmbk4qULdVftBHA6l4lE1x+yu/mgfoJXD2x8s9qr4D05REn /h4yqng4duYLzj+n9/eNx13vQQ9ZvjhEYkJNkHtv1KuvNBBqriq9naTYX8gsydoZUD i9oJX+1bThUXv0XrS7/9K5TZa5/XRw8TWhNT6uIlksjAjA4rXwidKlyRVqO1YEpOu8 GogfzPY4JS6enzBiSB0kj+mJjGMbZeY1V+uCdIcnWDAj+vGrxopVKAmgZcnhddTMXa 8XrktBNqMBMtw== Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:15:52 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Ira Weiny Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, fan.ni@samsung.com, a.manzanares@samsung.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf/cxlpmu: Support missing events in 3.1 spec Message-ID: <20241014141551.GA17702@willie-the-truck> References: <20241010025208.180458-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <670937ce7b7fd_9533f294b2@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <670937ce7b7fd_9533f294b2@iweiny-mobl.notmuch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241014_071558_032976_72EC51FB X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.74 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:35:58AM -0500, Ira Weiny wrote: > Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > Update the CXL PMU driver to support the new events introduced > > in the latest revision. These are: > > > > - read/write accesses with TEE constraints. > > - S2M indicating Modified state. > > > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > > Just to be sure: Jonathan you are taking this through CPMU correct? I was about to pick it up via the perf tree, so I'll hold fire until we hear back from Jonathan. Will