Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] rtc: s32g: add NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoC support

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 01:51:31PM +0300, Ciprian Costea wrote:
> From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>
> 
> Add a RTC driver for NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoCs.
> 
> The RTC module is used to enable Suspend to RAM (STR) support
> on NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoC based boards.
> RTC tracks clock time during system suspend.
> 
> RTC from S32G2/S32G3 is not battery-powered and it is not
> kept alive during system reset.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Bogdan Hamciuc <bogdan.hamciuc@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Hamciuc <bogdan.hamciuc@nxp.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/Kconfig    |  11 +
>  drivers/rtc/Makefile   |   1 +
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-s32g.c | 778 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 790 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/rtc/rtc-s32g.c


> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Makefile b/drivers/rtc/Makefile
> index 8ee79cb18322..a63d010a753c 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/Makefile
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RX8025)	+= rtc-rx8025.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RX8111)	+= rtc-rx8111.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RX8581)	+= rtc-rx8581.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_RZN1)	+= rtc-rzn1.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_S32G)	+= rtc-s32g.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_S35390A)	+= rtc-s35390a.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_S3C)	+= rtc-s3c.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_S5M)	+= rtc-s5m.o
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s32g.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s32g.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d6502d8bf616
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s32g.c


> +static const struct of_device_id rtc_dt_ids[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "nxp,s32g2-rtc", .data = &rtc_s32g2_data},
> +	{ .compatible = "nxp,s32g3-rtc", .data = &rtc_s32g2_data},

Considering the data is the same and g3 has a fallback to g2 in the 
binding, you can drop this line.

And really you don't need rtc_s32g2_data because there is only 1 
possible value. But maybe you know some differences which are coming 
soon? Then it's probably okay. Up to the RTC maintainer though.

Rob