From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76AEED0E6F7 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NnP5FFpDfPfkxNfCzIGryQtgDRYsg/mYEfAboo/domI=; b=BUlnYJvExAfC6lM7WeB2lVFAcG ZHRDjg0Dq0F7+oMOdDxEkB5W/FYXGqD9nDI0tZXqnyNyBaL2VQSZj1y9vtIjjO/1J2XtRskqB4pIi 3i/v6RsisPGGHvyjjFEA2PG1Ho+ivr2zpr09SWN4xeFFhyz/oz6ZTpSRuwd24NdomfUxG7REkyqly 2fxLAhFx9twSMrRhPa6KjYTBqaGPB+CvLATWhaRK6dEKKv+JnM3JVB89SIfsomPGwlPYsGQfJxEjP TmOmDV886jqLzgftFA/baTXHZDikfgdON3aRJJo+NdXW8L25bWk9w3PNvtZSSB+GgGCqWKt/diAly EyX8KgcQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t2qjh-000000074Uc-19fZ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:38:09 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:45d1:ec00::3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t2qh0-000000073vY-2zjq; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:35:23 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08AAA42739; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B92C5C4CEC7; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:35:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729510521; bh=NnP5FFpDfPfkxNfCzIGryQtgDRYsg/mYEfAboo/domI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mla1iWyj+nVKFELG9OM0sl2Ck1pK3QghS6o/oTV8/yZO3sp8Lrhej6jSyClxHf+SQ thPx5XAP1aAUIJ1n8IT0COeQ4y0ZeVIqMSpf0KwzwyvEUW9s7CpWQwsoC15nBySc43 1cy71HCUjzwiKPiqnJy1LGnFMjS+WcWEl/d6TXrgcRP3gxmWkzvOsGdhscwZhcZYrz xhHGMzlQnf9vWaZ5V5glMtdfRFtUVNGW7ulbJj5vilV63osFGEpT2UZxNnnfvBzD/p Yfm4VG1cmtIGDWWByk79cW/pP9OY7bGx9FXTAiU4LoOm6WYZbCJdJpch2JniAKpXnK toLAL2wB0CzAw== Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:35:16 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Fei Shao Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Chun-Kuang Hu , CK Hu , Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Matthias Brugger , Philipp Zabel , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dpi: Update device list with power-domains Message-ID: <20241021-january-dissuade-d391a189007b@spud> References: <20241019052935.553886-1-fshao@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y8NnBLaHu/CIQkrF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241019052935.553886-1-fshao@chromium.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241021_043522_838415_2FE2AD7E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --y8NnBLaHu/CIQkrF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 01:26:56PM +0800, Fei Shao wrote: > There are two kinds of MediaTek DPI devices in the tree: the ones with a > power domain and those without (or missing). The former are the majority > and are more common in newer DTs. Only three older DTs fall into the > latter category: MT2701, MT7623 and MT8192. >=20 > However, the current binding only allows particular DPI devices to have > power domains, which results in spurious binding check errors against > existing and new DTs. >=20 > Instead of diligently maintaining the allowed list, let's do it the > other way around - create an exception list for devices that are fine > not specifying a power domain. This list is expected to be fixed, and it > encourages new MTK DPI devices to describe their power domain whenever > possible; if not, those should be listed with proper rationale. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Fei Shao Acked-by: Conor Dooley --y8NnBLaHu/CIQkrF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZxY8dAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0syAAP0c5qRTn8GS7F+N997ftgRYudfJIwY28xnK83tSh6fSbwEAnGMsiLIl6DTW PLKeegSHvQKodm39IEv39tGUs88enQE= =R8QS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y8NnBLaHu/CIQkrF--