From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, keescook@chromium.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] crypto: arm64/crct10dif - Use faster 16x64 bit polynomial multiply
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:02:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241028190207.1394367-10-ardb+git@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241028190207.1394367-8-ardb+git@google.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
The CRC-T10DIF implementation for arm64 has a version that uses 8x8
polynomial multiplication, for cores that lack the crypto extensions,
which cover the 64x64 polynomial multiplication instruction that the
algorithm was built around.
This fallback version rather naively adopted the 64x64 polynomial
multiplication algorithm that I ported from ARM for the GHASH driver,
which needs 8 PMULL8 instructions to implement one PMULL64. This is
reasonable, given that each 8-bit vector element needs to be multiplied
with each element in the other vector, producing 8 vectors with partial
results that need to be combined to yield the correct result.
However, most PMULL64 invocations in the CRC-T10DIF code involve
multiplication by a pair of 16-bit folding coefficients, and so all the
partial results from higher order bytes will be zero, and there is no
need to calculate them to begin with.
Then, the CRC-T10DIF algorithm always XORs the output values of the
PMULL64 instructions being issued in pairs, and so there is no need to
faithfully implement each individual PMULL64 instruction, as long as
XORing the results pairwise produces the expected result.
Implementing these improvements results in a speedup of 3.3x on low-end
platforms such as Raspberry Pi 4 (Cortex-A72)
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-core.S | 71 +++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-core.S b/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-core.S
index 5604de61d06d..8d99ccf61f16 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-core.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-core.S
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
//
// Accelerated CRC-T10DIF using arm64 NEON and Crypto Extensions instructions
//
-// Copyright (C) 2016 Linaro Ltd <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
-// Copyright (C) 2019 Google LLC <ebiggers@google.com>
+// Copyright (C) 2016 Linaro Ltd
+// Copyright (C) 2019-2024 Google LLC
+//
+// Authors: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@google.com>
+// Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
//
// This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
@@ -122,6 +125,10 @@
sli perm2.2d, perm1.2d, #56
sli perm3.2d, perm1.2d, #48
sli perm4.2d, perm1.2d, #40
+
+ mov_q x5, 0x909010108080000
+ mov bd1.d[0], x5
+ zip1 bd1.16b, bd1.16b, bd1.16b
.endm
.macro __pmull_pre_p8, bd
@@ -196,6 +203,45 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(__pmull_p8_core)
ret
SYM_FUNC_END(__pmull_p8_core)
+SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(__pmull_p8_16x64)
+ ext t6.16b, t5.16b, t5.16b, #8
+
+ pmull t3.8h, t7.8b, t5.8b
+ pmull t4.8h, t7.8b, t6.8b
+ pmull2 t5.8h, t7.16b, t5.16b
+ pmull2 t6.8h, t7.16b, t6.16b
+
+ ext t8.16b, t3.16b, t3.16b, #8
+ eor t4.16b, t4.16b, t6.16b
+ ext t7.16b, t5.16b, t5.16b, #8
+ ext t6.16b, t4.16b, t4.16b, #8
+ eor t8.8b, t8.8b, t3.8b
+ eor t5.8b, t5.8b, t7.8b
+ eor t4.8b, t4.8b, t6.8b
+ ext t5.16b, t5.16b, t5.16b, #14
+ ret
+SYM_FUNC_END(__pmull_p8_16x64)
+
+ .macro pmull16x64_p64, a16, b64, c64
+ pmull2 \c64\().1q, \a16\().2d, \b64\().2d
+ pmull \b64\().1q, \a16\().1d, \b64\().1d
+ .endm
+
+ /*
+ * NOTE: the 16x64 bit polynomial multiply below is not equivalent to
+ * the one above, but XOR'ing the outputs together will produce the
+ * expected result, and this is sufficient in the context of this
+ * algorithm.
+ */
+ .macro pmull16x64_p8, a16, b64, c64
+ ext t7.16b, \b64\().16b, \b64\().16b, #1
+ tbl t5.16b, {\a16\().16b}, bd1.16b
+ uzp1 t7.16b, \b64\().16b, t7.16b
+ bl __pmull_p8_16x64
+ ext \b64\().16b, t4.16b, t4.16b, #15
+ eor \c64\().16b, t8.16b, t5.16b
+ .endm
+
.macro __pmull_p8, rq, ad, bd, i
.ifnc \bd, fold_consts
.err
@@ -218,14 +264,12 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(__pmull_p8_core)
.macro fold_32_bytes, p, reg1, reg2
ldp q11, q12, [buf], #0x20
- __pmull_\p v8, \reg1, fold_consts, 2
- __pmull_\p \reg1, \reg1, fold_consts
+ pmull16x64_\p fold_consts, \reg1, v8
CPU_LE( rev64 v11.16b, v11.16b )
CPU_LE( rev64 v12.16b, v12.16b )
- __pmull_\p v9, \reg2, fold_consts, 2
- __pmull_\p \reg2, \reg2, fold_consts
+ pmull16x64_\p fold_consts, \reg2, v9
CPU_LE( ext v11.16b, v11.16b, v11.16b, #8 )
CPU_LE( ext v12.16b, v12.16b, v12.16b, #8 )
@@ -238,11 +282,9 @@ CPU_LE( ext v12.16b, v12.16b, v12.16b, #8 )
// Fold src_reg into dst_reg, optionally loading the next fold constants
.macro fold_16_bytes, p, src_reg, dst_reg, load_next_consts
- __pmull_\p v8, \src_reg, fold_consts
- __pmull_\p \src_reg, \src_reg, fold_consts, 2
+ pmull16x64_\p fold_consts, \src_reg, v8
.ifnb \load_next_consts
ld1 {fold_consts.2d}, [fold_consts_ptr], #16
- __pmull_pre_\p fold_consts
.endif
eor \dst_reg\().16b, \dst_reg\().16b, v8.16b
eor \dst_reg\().16b, \dst_reg\().16b, \src_reg\().16b
@@ -296,7 +338,6 @@ CPU_LE( ext v7.16b, v7.16b, v7.16b, #8 )
// Load the constants for folding across 128 bytes.
ld1 {fold_consts.2d}, [fold_consts_ptr]
- __pmull_pre_\p fold_consts
// Subtract 128 for the 128 data bytes just consumed. Subtract another
// 128 to simplify the termination condition of the following loop.
@@ -318,7 +359,6 @@ CPU_LE( ext v7.16b, v7.16b, v7.16b, #8 )
// Fold across 64 bytes.
add fold_consts_ptr, fold_consts_ptr, #16
ld1 {fold_consts.2d}, [fold_consts_ptr], #16
- __pmull_pre_\p fold_consts
fold_16_bytes \p, v0, v4
fold_16_bytes \p, v1, v5
fold_16_bytes \p, v2, v6
@@ -339,8 +379,7 @@ CPU_LE( ext v7.16b, v7.16b, v7.16b, #8 )
// into them, storing the result back into v7.
b.lt .Lfold_16_bytes_loop_done_\@
.Lfold_16_bytes_loop_\@:
- __pmull_\p v8, v7, fold_consts
- __pmull_\p v7, v7, fold_consts, 2
+ pmull16x64_\p fold_consts, v7, v8
eor v7.16b, v7.16b, v8.16b
ldr q0, [buf], #16
CPU_LE( rev64 v0.16b, v0.16b )
@@ -387,9 +426,8 @@ CPU_LE( ext v0.16b, v0.16b, v0.16b, #8 )
bsl v2.16b, v1.16b, v0.16b
// Fold the first chunk into the second chunk, storing the result in v7.
- __pmull_\p v0, v3, fold_consts
- __pmull_\p v7, v3, fold_consts, 2
- eor v7.16b, v7.16b, v0.16b
+ pmull16x64_\p fold_consts, v3, v0
+ eor v7.16b, v3.16b, v0.16b
eor v7.16b, v7.16b, v2.16b
.Lreduce_final_16_bytes_\@:
@@ -450,7 +488,6 @@ CPU_LE( ext v7.16b, v7.16b, v7.16b, #8 )
// Load the fold-across-16-bytes constants.
ld1 {fold_consts.2d}, [fold_consts_ptr], #16
- __pmull_pre_\p fold_consts
cmp len, #16
b.eq .Lreduce_final_16_bytes_\@ // len == 16
--
2.47.0.163.g1226f6d8fa-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-28 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-28 19:02 [PATCH 0/6] Clean up and improve ARM/arm64 CRC-T10DIF code Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] crypto: arm64/crct10dif - Remove obsolete chunking logic Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 3:54 ` Eric Biggers
2024-10-28 19:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2024-10-30 4:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] crypto: arm64/crct10dif - Use faster 16x64 bit polynomial multiply Eric Biggers
2024-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] crypto: arm64/crct10dif - Remove remaining 64x64 PMULL fallback code Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 4:15 ` Eric Biggers
2024-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] crypto: arm/crct10dif - Use existing mov_l macro instead of __adrl Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 4:29 ` Eric Biggers
2024-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] crypto: arm/crct10dif - Macroify PMULL asm code Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 4:31 ` Eric Biggers
2024-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] crypto: arm/crct10dif - Implement plain NEON variant Ard Biesheuvel
2024-10-30 4:33 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241028190207.1394367-10-ardb+git@google.com \
--to=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).