From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
Cc: jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
hejunhao3@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
wangyushan12@huawei.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Improve the detection of associated CPUs
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:28:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241029132826.GB4416@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241026072424.29887-3-yangyicong@huawei.com>
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 03:24:18PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
>
> Currently the associated CPUs are detected in the cpuhp online
> callback. If the CPU's sccl_id or the ccl_id matches the PMU's,
> they're associated. There's an exception that some PMUs locate
> on the SICL and will match no CPUs. The events of these PMUs
> can be opened on any online CPUs. To handle this we just check
> whether the PMU's sccl_id is -1, if so we know it locates on
> SICL and make any CPU associated to it.
>
> This can be tweaked so in this patch just do the below changes:
> - If the PMU doesn't match any CPU then associated it to online CPUs
> - Choose the target CPU according to the NUMA affinity for opening
> events
>
> The function is implemented by hisi_pmu_init_associated_cpus() and
> invoked in hisi_pmu_init().
>
> Also the associated_cpus are maintained with all the online CPUs. This
> is redundant since we'll always schedule the events on the online CPUs.
> Get rid of this and make associated_cpus contain offline CPUs as well.
I don't really understand the rationale for this change. Why is the new
behaviour better than the old one?
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.h | 5 +++
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
> index 416f72a813fc..c3549e16e0c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
> @@ -399,6 +399,27 @@ void hisi_uncore_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(hisi_uncore_pmu_disable, HISI_PMU);
>
> +static void hisi_pmu_init_associated_cpus(struct hisi_pmu *hisi_pmu)
> +{
> + /*
> + * If the associated_cpus has already been initialized, for example
> + * determined by comparing the sccl_id and ccl_id with the CPU's
> + * mpidr_el1, then do nothing here. Otherwise the PMU has no affinity
> + * and could be opened on any online CPU.
> + */
> + if (!cpumask_empty(&hisi_pmu->associated_cpus))
> + return;
> +
> + cpumask_copy(&hisi_pmu->associated_cpus, cpu_online_mask);
Is it always safe to access 'cpu_online_mask' here?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-26 7:24 [PATCH v3 0/8] Refactor the common parts to the HiSilicon Uncore PMU core and cleanups Yicong Yang
2024-10-26 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Define a symbol namespace for HiSilicon Uncore PMUs Yicong Yang
2024-10-26 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Improve the detection of associated CPUs Yicong Yang
2024-10-29 13:28 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2024-10-30 14:04 ` Yicong Yang
2024-11-06 8:33 ` Yicong Yang
2024-11-06 11:51 ` Will Deacon
2024-11-07 14:11 ` Yicong Yang
2024-10-26 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Extract topology information to a separate structure Yicong Yang
2024-10-26 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Add a common function to retrieve topology from firmware Yicong Yang
2024-10-26 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Provide a generic implementation of cpumask/identifier Yicong Yang
2024-10-26 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Export associated CPUs of each PMU through sysfs Yicong Yang
2024-10-26 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Fix incorrect variable name "hha_pmu" in DDRC PMU driver Yicong Yang
2024-10-26 7:24 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] drivers/perf: hisi: Delete redundant blank line of DDRC PMU Yicong Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241029132826.GB4416@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=hejunhao3@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=wangyushan12@huawei.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox