From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Remove split on unmap behavior
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:11:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241105171100.GM458827@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105165942.GB12923@willie-the-truck>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 04:59:43PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > /* Full unmap */
> > iova = 0;
> > for_each_set_bit(i, &cfg.pgsize_bitmap, BITS_PER_LONG) {
>
> Yup, and you can do the same for the other selftest in io-pgtable-arm.c
Ugh, yes, I ran it and thought the log it printed was the success log,
it did actually fail too.
This seems like the right output:
arm-v7s io-pgtable: self test ok
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x40201000, IAS 32
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x40201000, IAS 36
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x40201000, IAS 40
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x40201000, IAS 42
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x40201000, IAS 44
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x40201000, IAS 48
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x02004000, IAS 32
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x02004000, IAS 36
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x02004000, IAS 40
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x02004000, IAS 42
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x02004000, IAS 44
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x02004000, IAS 48
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x20010000, IAS 32
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x20010000, IAS 36
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x20010000, IAS 40
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x20010000, IAS 42
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x20010000, IAS 44
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: pgsize_bitmap 0x20010000, IAS 48
arm-lpae io-pgtable: selftest: completed with 18 PASS 0 FAIL
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
index 9c9ecfdf87be90..abaf323843e3c0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
@@ -1283,19 +1283,6 @@ static int __init arm_lpae_run_tests(struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg)
iova += SZ_1G;
}
- /* Partial unmap */
- size = 1UL << __ffs(cfg->pgsize_bitmap);
- if (ops->unmap_pages(ops, SZ_1G + size, size, 1, NULL) != size)
- return __FAIL(ops, i);
-
- /* Remap of partial unmap */
- if (ops->map_pages(ops, SZ_1G + size, size, size, 1,
- IOMMU_READ, GFP_KERNEL, &mapped))
- return __FAIL(ops, i);
-
- if (ops->iova_to_phys(ops, SZ_1G + size + 42) != (size + 42))
- return __FAIL(ops, i);
-
/* Full unmap */
iova = 0;
for_each_set_bit(j, &cfg->pgsize_bitmap, BITS_PER_LONG) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 17:41 [PATCH v2 0/3] Remove split on unmap behavior Jason Gunthorpe
2024-11-04 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: " Jason Gunthorpe
2024-11-04 18:38 ` Liviu Dudau
2024-11-06 15:12 ` Steven Price
2024-11-04 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: " Jason Gunthorpe
2024-11-04 19:53 ` Robin Murphy
2024-11-04 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-11-05 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2024-11-05 17:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-11-04 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu: Add a kdoc to iommu_unmap() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-11-04 18:42 ` Liviu Dudau
2024-11-05 3:46 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241105171100.GM458827@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).