From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97EB2D41D72 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:23:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=nqTjLk1zD6oeEo+651Nbriswu6CCF85fypmhG0chddQ=; b=vz7JGJh7wPWTpas39MVmTp2nV7 9t0o7s74JyM74MBJs34dykPhBbgi3mQbgWL7khrkYNP8kppgaKkJ9vB55JF7wZbIidRZp3n9hPK8x m9cKaF3HaPrTT6SAOZkg5oYQ7i0O4Z75OkMnFnjXQ7yOd6H747ANuRzlaCgSZ7HfbgaNEagIzv/BX Ht+TGChJuxeQphLo9QRqeNhvCF3+qUVSWUVskGzkeiT9xfYM5soxfS/2gY+MDB/95cZvVxcSEEI5S RGmEUX3Ba3ARV1rje+GeY1rqy8O42ocRjae70Wtr8PWdT1pGB9rZA3UBubyTl46b2TO2wyd59G+OR 62Ps1K3Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tAn6s-00000002no6-0PsR; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:22:54 +0000 Received: from mail11.truemail.it ([2001:4b7e:0:8::81]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tAn54-00000002nV4-21Z5 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:21:04 +0000 Received: from francesco-nb (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8714F1FA05; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:20:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1731403259; bh=nqTjLk1zD6oeEo+651Nbriswu6CCF85fypmhG0chddQ=; h=From:To:Subject; b=NSPJ3oVXgNMobw7T+l2Hku9TkGxCiTqJdgAI4bhJFLR+/7GBaNWzVcJc2OHxi+jhd eS5NBfYRXfeB/c4L1T8+1iI7/DOR0QzWps2Dar7yw/mR8VebEwukyu+zKkKLy/a19Y lj4ISO32bml8ylATCB8ThOn2GRpHZoPqiFjxohKUFRseWRksJWfZDlif7iIl/+nW0u UdpbMzg+paTWriTKQw+FePelFAPwZ6WO0BG5+DqbD1qxvovo4EtrsFGo3HTZw1EyCD D55R9dwj/KQaeCimXmeqqjDxWoFRN15B9HJelZY5soybi4pkkq0Jh1URdKnU731rgm TXWjYwdLln1SQ== Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:20:54 +0100 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Shengjiu Wang , Frank Li Cc: Shengjiu Wang , abelvesa@kernel.org, peng.fan@nxp.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, shengjiu.wang@gmail.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, Adam Ford , Alexander Stein , Mark Brown , ulf.hansson@linaro.org Subject: Re: clk_imx8mp_audiomix_runtime_resume Kernel panic regression on v6.12 Message-ID: <20241112092054.GA18139@francesco-nb> References: <20241007132555.GA53279@francesco-nb> <20241112075958.GA8092@francesco-nb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241112075958.GA8092@francesco-nb> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241112_012102_730003_9CD1A592 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.40 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 08:59:58AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 03:25:55PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > it seems that an old regression is back on v6.12, reproduced on -rc2 > > (not sure about rc1). > > > > The original report is from https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424164725.GA18760@francesco-nb/ > > and it was fixed with https://lore.kernel.org/all/1715396125-3724-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com/. > > > > Is it now back? > > I was able to reproduce this issue once more, this time with 6.11.7. > As I wrote in another email the issue is not systematic as it used to > be. > > Any idea? Frank, Shengjiu, could it be that the udelay(5) in imx_pgc_power_up() is too short and therefore we have such non-systematic failures? Francesco