Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] pinctrl: meson: Add driver support for Amlogic A4 SoCs

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 03:29:42PM +0800, Xianwei Zhao wrote:
> Add a new pinctrl driver for Amlogic A4 SoCs which share
> the same register layout as the previous Amlogic S4.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/meson/Kconfig              |    6 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/meson/Makefile             |    1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-amlogic-a4.c | 1324 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 1331 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/Kconfig
> index cc397896762c..3e90bb5ec442 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/Kconfig
> @@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ config PINCTRL_MESON_S4
>  	select PINCTRL_MESON_AXG_PMX
>  	default y
>  
> +config PINCTRL_AMLOGIC_A4
> +	tristate "Amlogic A4 SoC pinctrl driver"
> +	depends on ARM64
> +	select PINCTRL_MESON_AXG_PMX
> +	default y
> +
>  config PINCTRL_AMLOGIC_C3
>  	tristate "Amlogic C3 SoC pinctrl driver"
>  	depends on ARM64
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/Makefile
> index 9e538b9ffb9b..c92a65a83344 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/Makefile
> @@ -10,5 +10,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MESON_AXG) += pinctrl-meson-axg.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MESON_G12A) += pinctrl-meson-g12a.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MESON_A1) += pinctrl-meson-a1.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_MESON_S4) += pinctrl-meson-s4.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMLOGIC_A4) += pinctrl-amlogic-a4.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMLOGIC_C3) += pinctrl-amlogic-c3.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMLOGIC_T7) += pinctrl-amlogic-t7.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-amlogic-a4.c b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-amlogic-a4.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..edc5f2ba2c8a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-amlogic-a4.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1324 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Pin controller and GPIO driver for Amlogic A4 SoC.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Amlogic, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
> + *         Huqiang Qin <huqiang.qin@amlogic.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include "pinctrl-meson.h"
> +#include "pinctrl-meson-axg-pmx.h"
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/amlogic-gpio.h>
> +
> +/* Standard port */
> +
> +#define GPIOE_0				0
> +#define GPIOE_1				1
> +
> +#define GPIOD_0				2
> +#define GPIOD_1				3
> +#define GPIOD_2				4
> +#define GPIOD_3				5
> +#define GPIOD_4				6
> +#define GPIOD_5				7
> +#define GPIOD_6				8
> +#define GPIOD_7				9
> +#define GPIOD_8				10
> +#define GPIOD_9				11
> +#define GPIOD_10			12
> +#define GPIOD_11			13
> +#define GPIOD_12			14
> +#define GPIOD_13			15
> +#define GPIOD_14			16
> +#define GPIOD_15			17

The conversion from bank+index to a single index space seems less than 
ideal, and looks like a work-around to fit into the existing driver from 
a brief look at it.

If there's not really banks of GPIOs here, then DT shouldn't have them 
either. The question is does anything need to know the bank number 
and/or index? If it's only for human readability (and matching to 
datasheet), then just something like this can be done:

#define GPIOD(n) (2 + (n))

Rob