From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR GENERIC OF HOSTS"
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:PCI DRIVER FOR GENERIC OF HOSTS"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peng Fan" <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: check bridge->bus in pci_host_common_remove
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:50:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241115062005.6ifvr6ens2qnrrrf@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241028084644.3778081-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 04:46:43PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> When PCI node was created using an overlay and the overlay is
> reverted/destroyed, the "linux,pci-domain" property no longer exists,
> so of_get_pci_domain_nr will return failure. Then
> of_pci_bus_release_domain_nr will actually use the dynamic IDA, even
> if the IDA was allocated in static IDA. So the flow is as below:
> A: of_changeset_revert
> pci_host_common_remove
> pci_bus_release_domain_nr
> of_pci_bus_release_domain_nr
> of_get_pci_domain_nr # fails because overlay is gone
> ida_free(&pci_domain_nr_dynamic_ida)
>
> With driver calls pci_host_common_remove explicity, the flow becomes:
> B pci_host_common_remove
> pci_bus_release_domain_nr
> of_pci_bus_release_domain_nr
> of_get_pci_domain_nr # succeeds in this order
> ida_free(&pci_domain_nr_static_ida)
> A of_changeset_revert
> pci_host_common_remove
>
> With updated flow, the pci_host_common_remove will be called twice,
> so need to check 'bridge->bus' to avoid accessing invalid pointer.
>
> Fixes: c14f7ccc9f5d ("PCI: Assign PCI domain IDs by ida_alloc()")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
I went through the previous discussion [1] and I couldn't see an agreement on
the point raised by Bjorn on 'removing the host bridge before the overlay'.
I do think this is a valid point and if you do not think so, please state the
reason.
- Mani
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230913115737.GA426735@bhelgaas/
> ---
>
> V1:
> Not sure to keep the fixes here. I could drop the Fixes tag if it is
> improper.
> This is to revisit the patch [1] which was rejected last year. This
> new flow is using the suggest flow following Bjorn's suggestion.
> But of_changeset_revert will still invoke plaform_remove and then
> pci_host_common_remove. So worked out this patch together with a patch
> to jailhouse driver as below:
> static void destroy_vpci_of_overlay(void)
> {
> + struct device_node *vpci_node = NULL;
> +
> if (overlay_applied) {
> +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(6,6,0)
> + vpci_node = of_find_node_by_path("/pci@0");
> + if (vpci_node) {
> + struct platform_device *pdev = of_find_device_by_node(vpci_node);
> + if (!pdev)
> + printk("Not found device for /pci@0\n");
> + else {
> + pci_host_common_remove(pdev);
> + platform_device_put(pdev);
> + }
> + }
> + of_node_put(vpci_node);
> +#endif
> +
> of_changeset_revert(&overlay_changeset);
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230908224858.GA306960@bhelgaas/T/#md12e6097d91a012ede78c997fc5abf460029a569
>
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
> index cf5f59a745b3..5a9c29fc57cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-host-common.c
> @@ -86,8 +86,10 @@ void pci_host_common_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> - pci_stop_root_bus(bridge->bus);
> - pci_remove_root_bus(bridge->bus);
> + if (bridge->bus) {
> + pci_stop_root_bus(bridge->bus);
> + pci_remove_root_bus(bridge->bus);
> + }
> pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_host_common_remove);
> --
> 2.37.1
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-28 8:46 [PATCH] PCI: check bridge->bus in pci_host_common_remove Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-11-15 6:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-11-15 10:14 ` Peng Fan
2024-11-15 14:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-19 7:30 ` Peng Fan
2024-11-27 19:56 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-02 9:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-02 13:55 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-15 13:26 ` Peng Fan
2024-12-16 5:08 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-19 17:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241115062005.6ifvr6ens2qnrrrf@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).