From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3B6EE7716C for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:05:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=wUq+5zh9qdHlN5brY5WX38A0V/NvzHGPCb1YfbsPb14=; b=DIUGZDqfXeln/f1Ze+E7mJXvl+ QSz8616lc7ccO764EsmladgPRnyZUlQAg3Xwr2nUKAP8NXiyjuPlOcVKCv3YBA91QXn5MMF1aeZFy U9P9F87CQKdvPV0aS8N3T42LEkXg/iBMfUkKWBQ7RvjGkjEi3VzjRJFZPv3HZvUSkPu4dhLH7fcsE bwtsMnLrGTOeV/Gam/pliGtCpcEc4itY6g5CsucWXl+vcepehARchzw6z9o/Cf1yCCIDS38shAAZ3 izAQlReL4b0Y1XngKbMBD/vcX7dLIm7UUWsPEi+DjDQ/y6WQybJBb4NRebwTZmetzg5NStK1zUlum QR5fE8BQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tJ6rH-0000000F7Dy-0UJJ; Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:05:11 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tJ6qF-0000000F724-4BYc; Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:04:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D560A42A97; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F234C4CED6; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:04:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1733385846; bh=FIozSi8SgpqkY9ZdwR7YpI65MxDaseGvlnzWbKVg2nk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cCM/WL7AcmSti272C/8pmCDv4/kLRfmjlVaxX6jKtkohw9FU+pWVbFqN4btG9sx1u XLqWNZjvXB3yI3t6NUvjR32zdTUc0z9+CF/hZQ58QjaxQ/+2VfMyW6NYoqvAb1t2L6 67Q9FWFCiKGW3ZiwO2xNke6z1SrKKCgiK/Rdd9t0= Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 09:04:02 +0100 From: Greg KH To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik Cc: Vinod Koul , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Marek Szyprowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Alim Akhtar , Peter Griffin , Tudor Ambarus , Sam Protsenko , Will McVicker , Roy Luo , kernel-team@android.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: gs101: ensure power is gated to SS phy in phy_exit() Message-ID: <2024120528-poker-thinness-6cfb@gregkh> References: <20241205-gs101-phy-lanes-orientation-phy-v3-0-32f721bed219@linaro.org> <20241205-gs101-phy-lanes-orientation-phy-v3-5-32f721bed219@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20241205-gs101-phy-lanes-orientation-phy-v3-5-32f721bed219@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241205_000408_113222_BBFC6A3A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.20 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 07:33:16AM +0000, André Draszik wrote: > We currently don't gate the power to the SS phy in phy_exit(). > > Shuffle the code slightly to ensure the power is gated to the SS phy as > well. > > Fixes: 32267c29bc7d ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support Exynos USBDRD 3.1 combo phy (HS & SS)") > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.11+ Why is a patch 5/8 a stable thing? If this is such an important bugfix, it should be sent separately as a 1/1 patch, right? thanks, greg k-h