From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4308E7717D for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 23:41:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=uI7KRrsJCwKAEhUPghYG3oAvPQyCprZOP0dck1wkdRE=; b=wGqtc84cA2rjGEkH3M2e/X04Ja rkzv9bAf1b46A+Qz0qxuk2cCV3cCSrqe2kU7avNyOrhDD0+xcie2hxCW2NCFW4GNwPxZ9/0hcIJll L5qzTmpeMZkI1yNML84y/hrH6yypRWY3bdqlRjFbG0SCzYZ88DJBJRg0aSQy/HVWn03jyybf7SZdt PXjoivEHGQt6y1hZcK8ppXtRSsHg/51qDzfyeFTux6Q1I/1ayUYBT+D/jbQ5AUCQmyBQJftrYa24/ Gp0vHS7Q7wb6R2Z78gnoF01upqJX4XxI3YXkd7ca+VGvdfOk+y6ZExkR4xAQ8E7DXVa7TQ6iyJi1E wJNP/XaQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tKnNh-00000009bMM-3NOb; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 23:41:37 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tKnMe-00000009bFB-3o8r; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 23:40:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E9D5C5DEA; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 23:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37CABC4CED1; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 23:40:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733787632; bh=BA3duGjUYPvGt2f4+K5L5RH1loqbyxLxJMRIpyaILmo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Kztj4lA8lDAmSnUT5tJAv2cjEFrlBhTk0sI+1anlxEucU7S3ppmCiiWp5j4UokfY5 m2BSlb5gR8sB7vJTcTjbsusvlp3qeZySOwq+xumA8ySDM1kPDzfUE3UC28tuXfdOyu h9nNK1YCihA7AkI/xYMpeyyJxxf7458SLNL4wVNwRdACYpZ7SqOup4EI6ovshHP8ue bUE/M59+4CE35vCbPFYegUUYE71neBMWZK/ac0t4DUOfz6rZf1CEdOYHKAGhr1VfCj 6CxapaXrpuDI4Lupv+e3t3V242MpkykZGjpXu5omW31b4jYWhtn/ZVMAlPgZ+UFFBx bp7H1SQcIDumw== Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:40:30 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Christian Marangi Cc: Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Vladimir Oltean , Srinivas Kandagatla , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, upstream@airoha.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v11 5/9] mfd: an8855: Add support for Airoha AN8855 Switch MFD Message-ID: <20241209154030.0f34d5dd@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <67577bd7.7b0a0220.1ce6b5.fe93@mx.google.com> References: <20241209134459.27110-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20241209134459.27110-6-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20241209151813.106eda03@kernel.org> <67577bd7.7b0a0220.1ce6b5.fe93@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241209_154032_990424_07EBE390 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.83 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:22:59 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote: > Also hope we won't have to request multiple stable tag for this multi > subsystem patch. Any hint on that? Sorry I haven't payed much attention to earlier discussions. Why multiple stable tags? AFAICT all trees will need patches 4 and 5, so we can put that on a stable tag / branch, the rest can go directly into respective trees (assuming the table tag has been merged in). No?