Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM SMMU DRIVERS"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Only enable stall on smmu-v2
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 12:57:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250107125738.GA6991@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250102183232.115279-1-robdclark@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 10:32:31AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> 
> On mmu-500, stall-on-fault seems to stall all context banks, causing the
> GMU to misbehave.  So limit this feature to smmu-v2 for now.
> 
> This fixes an issue with an older mesa bug taking outo the system
> because of GMU going off into the weeds.
> 
> What we _think_ is happening is that, if the GPU generates 1000's of
> faults at ~once (which is something that GPUs can be good at), it can
> result in a sufficient number of stalled translations preventing other
> transactions from entering the same TBU.

MMU-500 is an implementation of the SMMUv2 architecture, so this feels
upside-down to me. That is, it should always be valid to probe with
the less specific "SMMUv2" compatible string (modulo hardware errata)
and be limited to the architectural behaviour.

So what is about MMU-500 that means stalling doesn't work when compared
to any other SMMUv2 implementation?

Will


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-02 18:32 [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Only enable stall on smmu-v2 Rob Clark
2025-01-02 19:30 ` Akhil P Oommen
2025-01-06 20:10   ` Akhil P Oommen
2025-01-06 20:59     ` Rob Clark
2025-01-06 21:00     ` Rob Clark
2025-01-07 12:57 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-01-07 15:26   ` Rob Clark
2025-01-07 22:43     ` Dmitry Baryshkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250107125738.GA6991@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox