linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
To: "Csókás, Bence" <csokas.bence@prolan.hu>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
	Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] spi: atmel-quadspi: Add support for sama7g5 QSPI
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:56:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250110-paycheck-irregular-bcddab1276c7@thorsis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241128174316.3209354-3-csokas.bence@prolan.hu>

Hello,

found another suspicious area regarding pm_runtime in
atmel_qspi_probe(), see below (irrelevant stuff dropped this time) …

Am Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 06:43:15PM +0100 schrieb Csókás, Bence:
> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> 

[…]

> @@ -726,18 +1411,32 @@ static int atmel_qspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  				"failed to enable the QSPI system clock\n");
>  			goto disable_pclk;
>  		}
> +	} else if (aq->caps->has_gclk) {
> +		/* Get the QSPI generic clock */
> +		aq->gclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "gclk");
> +		if (IS_ERR(aq->gclk)) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing Generic clock\n");
> +			err = PTR_ERR(aq->gclk);
> +			goto disable_pclk;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (aq->caps->has_dma) {
> +		err = atmel_qspi_dma_init(ctrl);
> +		if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			goto disable_qspick;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Request the IRQ */
>  	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>  	if (irq < 0) {
>  		err = irq;
> -		goto disable_qspick;
> +		goto dma_release;
>  	}
>  	err = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, atmel_qspi_interrupt,
>  			       0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), aq);
>  	if (err)
> -		goto disable_qspick;
> +		goto dma_release;
>  
>  	pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 500);
>  	pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -745,7 +1444,9 @@ static int atmel_qspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>  	pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
>  
> -	atmel_qspi_init(aq);
> +	err = atmel_qspi_init(aq);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto dma_release;

This error handling leads to unbalanced pm_runtime right?  The block
below rolls back pm_runtime before jumping to 'dma_release', this here
does not.

>  	err = spi_register_controller(ctrl);
>  	if (err) {
> @@ -753,13 +1454,16 @@ static int atmel_qspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>  		pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev);
>  		pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> -		goto disable_qspick;
> +		goto dma_release;
>  	}

This hunk got it right?

>  	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&pdev->dev);
>  	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> +dma_release:
> +	if (aq->caps->has_dma)
> +		atmel_qspi_dma_release(aq);
>  disable_qspick:
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(aq->qspick);
>  disable_pclk:
> @@ -768,6 +1472,44 @@ static int atmel_qspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return err;
>  }

I think this is another issue of forwarding porting.  The pm_runtime
stuff was added in mainline after the original patch was forked of,
and not entirely considered when porting?

Greets
Alex


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-10  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-28 17:43 [PATCH v3 0/2] spi: atmel-quadspi: Refactor to allow supporting SAMA7G5 O/QSPI Csókás, Bence
2024-11-28 17:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] spi: atmel-quadspi: Create `atmel_qspi_ops` to support newer SoC families Csókás, Bence
2024-11-28 17:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] spi: atmel-quadspi: Add support for sama7g5 QSPI Csókás, Bence
2024-12-18  9:32   ` Alexander Dahl
2025-01-09 16:27   ` Alexander Dahl
2025-01-09 16:41     ` Mark Brown
2025-01-10 10:40     ` Alexander Dahl
2025-01-14 17:13       ` Csókás Bence
2025-01-10  7:56   ` Alexander Dahl [this message]
2025-01-14 17:21     ` Csókás Bence
2024-12-17 18:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] spi: atmel-quadspi: Refactor to allow supporting SAMA7G5 O/QSPI Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250110-paycheck-irregular-bcddab1276c7@thorsis.com \
    --to=ada@thorsis.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
    --cc=csokas.bence@prolan.hu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=varshini.rajendran@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).