linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] PCI: dwc: Use devicetree 'ranges' property to get rid of cpu_addr_fixup() callback
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:29:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250116232916.GA617353@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250116231358.GA616783@bhelgaas>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 05:14:00PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 02:44:20PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > parent_bus_addr in struct of_range can indicate address information just
> > ahead of PCIe controller. Most system's bus fabric use 1:1 map between
> > input and output address. but some hardware like i.MX8QXP doesn't use 1:1
> > map. See below diagram:
> > 
> >             ┌─────────┐                    ┌────────────┐
> >  ┌─────┐    │         │ IA: 0x8ff8_0000    │            │
> >  │ CPU ├───►│   ┌────►├─────────────────┐  │ PCI        │
> >  └─────┘    │   │     │ IA: 0x8ff0_0000 │  │            │
> >   CPU Addr  │   │  ┌─►├─────────────┐   │  │ Controller │
> > 0x7ff8_0000─┼───┘  │  │             │   │  │            │
> >             │      │  │             │   │  │            │   PCI Addr
> > 0x7ff0_0000─┼──────┘  │             │   └──► IOSpace   ─┼────────────►
> >             │         │             │      │            │    0
> > 0x7000_0000─┼────────►├─────────┐   │      │            │
> >             └─────────┘         │   └──────► CfgSpace  ─┼────────────►
> >              BUS Fabric         │          │            │    0
> >                                 │          │            │
> >                                 └──────────► MemSpace  ─┼────────────►
> >                         IA: 0x8000_0000    │            │  0x8000_0000
> >                                            └────────────┘
> > 
> > bus@5f000000 {
> > 	compatible = "simple-bus";
> > 	#address-cells = <1>;
> > 	#size-cells = <1>;
> > 	ranges = <0x80000000 0x0 0x70000000 0x10000000>;
> > 
> > 	pcie@5f010000 {
> > 		compatible = "fsl,imx8q-pcie";
> > 		reg = <0x5f010000 0x10000>, <0x8ff00000 0x80000>;
> > 		reg-names = "dbi", "config";
> > 		#address-cells = <3>;
> > 		#size-cells = <2>;
> > 		device_type = "pci";
> > 		bus-range = <0x00 0xff>;
> > 		ranges = <0x81000000 0 0x00000000 0x8ff80000 0 0x00010000>,
> > 			 <0x82000000 0 0x80000000 0x80000000 0 0x0ff00000>;
> > 	...
> > 	};
> > };
> > 
> > Term internal address (IA) here means the address just before PCIe
> > controller. After ATU use this IA instead CPU address, cpu_addr_fixup() can
> > be removed.
> 
> > @@ -730,9 +779,15 @@ static int dw_pcie_iatu_setup(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> >  
> >  		atu.index = i;
> >  		atu.type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM;
> > -		atu.cpu_addr = entry->res->start;
> > +		parent_bus_addr = entry->res->start;
> >  		atu.pci_addr = entry->res->start - entry->offset;
> >  
> > +		ret = dw_pcie_get_parent_addr(pci, entry->res->start, &parent_bus_addr);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +
> > +		atu.cpu_addr = parent_bus_addr;
> 
> Here you set atu.cpu_addr to the intermediate bus address instead
> of the CPU physical address before calling
> dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu().
> 
> But what about other callers of dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu()?  Don't
> all of them need to use the intermediate bus address?

Somehow I expected the patch to skip calling ->cpu_addr_fixup() if the
driver had set 'use_parent_dt_ranges'.  In fact, I think that's a
requirement.

Since dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu() is the only dwc caller, maybe the
parent_bus_addr change should go *there* instead of in the callers?

Bjorn


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-19 19:44 [PATCH v8 0/7] PCI: dwc: opitimaze RC Host/EP pci_fixup_addr() Frank Li
2024-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] of: address: Add parent_bus_addr to struct of_pci_range Frank Li
2024-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] PCI: dwc: Use devicetree 'ranges' property to get rid of cpu_addr_fixup() callback Frank Li
2024-11-24 14:33   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-01-16  1:47     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-01-16  1:56       ` Frank Li
2025-01-16 23:13   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-16 23:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-01-17 15:42       ` Frank Li
2025-01-23 15:21         ` Frank Li
2025-01-23 19:04           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-23 19:15             ` Frank Li
2025-01-27 15:24               ` Niklas Cassel
2025-01-23 19:09         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-17 15:50     ` Frank Li
2024-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] PCI: dwc: ep: Add bus_addr_base for outbound window Frank Li
2025-01-16 15:32   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-16 18:04     ` Frank Li
2025-01-16 19:45       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-16 20:02         ` Frank Li
2025-01-16 22:49           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-17 14:35             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-01-17 15:17               ` Frank Li
2024-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] PCI: imx6: Remove cpu_addr_fixup() Frank Li
2024-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] dt-bindings: PCI: fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep: Add compatible string fsl,imx8q-pcie-ep Frank Li
2024-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] PCI: imx6: Pass correct sub mode when calling phy_set_mode_ext() Frank Li
2024-11-19 19:44 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] PCI: imx6: Add i.MX8Q PCIe Endpoint (EP) support Frank Li
2024-11-24 14:38 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] PCI: dwc: opitimaze RC Host/EP pci_fixup_addr() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-10 22:16   ` Frank Li
2024-12-19 19:55     ` Frank Li
2025-01-06 17:14       ` Frank Li
2025-01-07 17:59         ` Frank Li
2025-01-16  1:56         ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-01-15 11:42 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250116232916.GA617353@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).