From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A92C02188 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:05:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=0KUmT5HMoGiak2FyyfKrfZlJKbyNJNTNogw0QxKEjjE=; b=Qmu2bqpQqlVURiDagnmOEQ6o/+ IWfRedLRs0b1+0aAQHMOwAyjs1ORvD1CXiHxETQrw/NbTLTynMi7taEXLeQUyPfcsu8Nf/1Kq5lq1 0Fs5Bz1BjbWNEaUzczfoQXAF4w5iPmegIapsi2JRiTLwNO5rCagZXFBPIwYdi8Qyh9owwaeq1SRUD K2XbmJXkLzI4nYgF9GkH+oQXG1/i06Gds+HU0YPv7POY30A2P6XYcZwmdVcE9gxiG1oN9/IHdByO2 4pENisvaTgLSFuQo8jmUZDOLvJQbVTanC9wgSFSjD2842gOMhE2BftR0Hso8WlaQn65x69Tcpgt3K 07yLIalg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tcWI9-00000003GMw-2gPs; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:05:09 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tcWGn-00000003GFT-2BxN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:03:46 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6555C5959; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6DFFC4CED2; Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:03:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738011824; bh=WVG1MPhd1HOw3Gt5nUM041Hsql8yO2/kRnMQw0w2s+g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pkaE2m9IYX3BiHqcBoFLWU4//r7Wjk8TGvMJ92/b51qrSj02gFTXn+H1tmtfaCvON az4e9drcle1/kXlP4KKGiG5Da4zjh0KxAhxn1HPEMdDv78oVpa4Bb9HqeOj+bpQDBM C7AiBzDupLGTGePtkfanyUrmCKEJKjvXPoeZkAvkqQ5h/rsoZ1VG/jmvGCioT4znJ1 bKrkqoumWFBJ7OB03jR3gR9o+xIl6yTR4okl/ToDpwfzfsKisKRiLYSPTfqaIiJyT3 QdLw1u0nzKqxNdLF15EMevuQTiIRRTOk55tN6lk9a7w4OXXoosUVEPFGtR7EOZRn58 LJywnw+L9rMaw== Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:03:42 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Huacai Chen Cc: Andrew Lunn , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Kunihiko Hayashi , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] net: stmmac: Fix usage of maximum queue number macros Message-ID: <20250127130342.4e5d1f9e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250127092450.2945611-1-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250127_130345_612691_EC44B327 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:47:29 +0800 Huacai Chen wrote: > > There is another aspect to this. We are adding warnings saying that > > the device tree blob is broken. That should encourage users to upgrade > > their device tree blob. But most won't find any newer version. If this > > goes into net-next, the roll out will be a lot slower, developers on > > the leading edge will find the DT issue and submit a DT patch. By the > > time this is in a distro kernel, maybe most of the DT issues will > > already be fixed? > Goto net or goto net-next are both fine to me, I just think this > series should be backported to stable branches. There are lots of > patches backported even though they are less important than this > series (maybe not in the network subsystem). Please remove the Fixes tags when reposting. -- pw-bot: defer