From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Inki Dae <daeinki@gmail.com>
Cc: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wait_event_timeout() usage in decon_wait_for_vblank()
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:59:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203155933.GA786168@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAQKjZNqFt=SYxCzpQ5JwOADRUwsWsq5KzLRoPG++27SXGubnQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 01:02:47PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2025년 2월 1일 (토) 오전 1:56, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>님이 작성:
> >
> > I don't know this code at all, so this is likely just noise, but the
> > wait_event_timeout() usage in decon_wait_for_vblank() looks funny to
> > me.
> >
> > decon_wait_for_vblank() waits on wait_vsync_queue for wait_vsync_event
> > to be cleared.
> >
> > But decon_irq_handler() only clears wait_vsync_event and wakes up
> > wait_vsync_queue when !ctx->i80_if.
> >
> > I don't see any i80_if connection in decon_wait_for_vblank(). Does
> > the wait always time out if i80_if is set? Is there some reason we
> > don't use decon_wait_for_vblank() at all if i80_if is set?
>
> For the decon series, the implementation for the i80 interface has not
> yet been completed. If you would like to see how the i80 interface is
> handled in Exynos, please refer to the code for the legacy display
> controller module, exynos_drm_fimd.c, available at the following link:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c?h=exynos-drm-fixes#n1053
>
> Furthermore, please note that within the decon driver, prior to
> creating the CRTC, it is necessary to implement the TE handler for the
> i80 interface in the te_handler of exynos_drm_crtc_ops and register it
> as a callback.
I'll take your word for it that this all works as intended. For many
wait_event_timeout() callers, the connection between kicking off some
operation, waiting for completion, and doing the wakeup is a little
bit obscure and hard to analyze without deep knowledge of the driver.
This was just one instance of those.
Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 16:55 wait_event_timeout() usage in decon_wait_for_vblank() Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-02 4:02 ` Inki Dae
2025-02-03 15:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203155933.GA786168@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=daeinki@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox