linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Wei-Lin Chang <r09922117@csie.ntu.edu.tw>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
	Dmytro Terletskyi <Dmytro_Terletskyi@epam.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: timer: Always evaluate the need for a soft timer
Date: Tue,  4 Feb 2025 11:00:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250204110050.150560-2-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204110050.150560-1-maz@kernel.org>

When updating the interrupt state for an emulated timer, we return
early and skip the setup of a soft timer that runs in parallel
with the guest.

While this is OK if we have set the interrupt pending, it is pretty
wrong if the guest moved CVAL into the future.  In that case,
no timer is armed and the guest can wait for a very long time
(it will take a full put/load cycle for the situation to resolve).

This is specially visible with EDK2 running at EL2, but still
using the EL1 virtual timer, which in that case is fully emulated.
Any key-press takes ages to be captured, as there is no UART
interrupt and EDK2 relies on polling from a timer...

The fix is simply to drop the early return. If the timer interrupt
is pending, we will still return early, and otherwise arm the soft
timer.

Fixes: 4d74ecfa6458b ("KVM: arm64: Don't arm a hrtimer for an already pending timer")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
index d3d243366536c..035e43f5d4f9a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
@@ -471,10 +471,8 @@ static void timer_emulate(struct arch_timer_context *ctx)
 
 	trace_kvm_timer_emulate(ctx, should_fire);
 
-	if (should_fire != ctx->irq.level) {
+	if (should_fire != ctx->irq.level)
 		kvm_timer_update_irq(ctx->vcpu, should_fire, ctx);
-		return;
-	}
 
 	kvm_timer_update_status(ctx, should_fire);
 
-- 
2.39.2



  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-04 11:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM/arm64: timer fixes for 6.14 Marc Zyngier
2025-02-04 11:00 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-02-04 14:17   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: arm64: timer: Always evaluate the need for a soft timer Dmytro Terletskyi
2025-02-04 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: arm64: timer: Correctly handle EL1 timer emulation when !FEAT_ECV Marc Zyngier
2025-02-04 14:17   ` Dmytro Terletskyi
2025-02-04 11:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: arm64: timer: Don't adjust the EL2 virtual timer offset Marc Zyngier
2025-02-04 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM/arm64: timer fixes for 6.14 Oliver Upton
2025-02-04 15:12 ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250204110050.150560-2-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dmytro_Terletskyi@epam.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=r09922117@csie.ntu.edu.tw \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).