From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70311C0219C for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:48:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=LO2er1K6vaE6/L7m9yk2utZM2k5CwTiygTMMgy6dNQ0=; b=40yAEMm5hr5cTsGSRykJCgUA7p 8lxG3REsMzvjJCybJPBf2R1zmKPKNv9wb1GWXY4wiz6X0c7KqoRBeIyBSeJ4k2dABYsV94jVHWW5j ylYjlmw6aiibluUm9OJjFHHYXRFDWaBXYNBTlLzs77M8+v3amqpXx54K1ow/HniGegJ4aYT+1y2Zx Wsgayy6Uzeevxbw82fCjqAhMbg08JXAU9nkvBWxEBmmZEE7J+AEo0WZ8JuLd2reZr+Z+ri9Obi2/f ZsrZ9vooqU4y37p3Ne86IEkfE/VsfCJfvMQt8fsy9zB5Y3gUKCJ16OdmQ2fy26rbhIHPjfEOklfRU OpDbGUUA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tfjVE-0000000494k-0Xno; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 17:47:56 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([147.75.193.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tfjM6-000000047dq-2Zdz; Wed, 05 Feb 2025 17:38:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8064A438D1; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9547EC4CEE2; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:38:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738777109; bh=6QJJPtO3WlYPPGSP0H8aWwAJg0ctvHWUXT0e2WNEeHE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MsLyFODUcEFb8uO9sgi4xZpO9PYRDdZOES/lZgiqBuN8wK0rpYCZyyFUZPsRV/815 eVszkZ84dPOVH3oi7rt+AbIWKXy03058S4pFxx7l5DQ6Z1/aI1g+IVpQn6g+cxDIl9 QOWiN0BSBHDQPpDQV2dp7S8V+JJQ0tqEreVR/ejFgVrEBi2Hq+i8UV5e3i8elKKxMy 3Qgndet8XKwPQTJJutsYvw441+bty+yDxo5KIBzoW3wbIaIspA/f+NL7dZuOf89MPr a6l+h/rNIdMjTWZXDTh2TVMGC4DGBrLzpraW+eHCTJqhl6aVLcGhtxSEM1mV8dmDyy 1VNweqr9a9gzA== Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:38:24 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Heiko Stuebner , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Steven Price , Kunihiko Hayashi , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Provide FIFO sizes for DWMAC 1000 Message-ID: <20250205173824.GJ554665@kernel.org> References: <20250204161359.3335241-1-wens@kernel.org> <20250204134331.270d5c4e@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250205_093830_721532_B244FBCC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.32 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:45:17AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 5:43 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 00:13:59 +0800 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > Since a fix for stmmac in general has already been sent [1] and a revert > > > was also proposed [2], I'll refrain from sending mine. > > > > No, no, please do. You need to _submit_ the revert like a normal patch. > > With all the usual details in the commit message. > > Mine isn't a revert, but simply downgrading the error to a warning. > So... yet another workaround approach. I think the point is that someone needs to formally submit the revert. And I assume it should target the net tree.