From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E90C02194 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:36:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Owner; bh=7WvP02qICs8Ho2OpuTmY61FFwlzbkHaH5jA0+tFbyIY=; b=ck5KBmBMoYaXBmiwAggJ8t3E19 xtWOeA0kJEjP2hs0n7zi2MYZC/uvgn5HNdi0fQ11tKJ12+p0OhqNOEE4oSjSl4Zy0RrjJVkVjV0rT eY1W3q9pdrEwTWeDLHyLoBxAkHLUIZyRbfSzoD5rCyQyCGzZMBL+ssCUJ1ykxtODwg6sc+q1OZ2tG l8ohreS/fkQuhOpQDYSpLX6O7/+tFJMCsEGPFGtBW/iIDZZ6RUt/4vxdV0fEOdaaliyKzyaP3Ga3S ERRphdnTxKP3WX/2nEGrvYv6DRSKN2SKepoDD9cxM8GJEGoGjbix0+8a0QFz/a8c6Pgp/5byfoGvk yjrmpPhg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tfzEc-00000005z4U-1XTj; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:35:50 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:45d1:ec00::3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tfzDE-00000005yuc-3snw; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:34:26 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2138CA440A0; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1E42C4CEDD; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:34:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738838063; bh=HtJGuuBPY7GzLXY3kxC0VzXl+lpKcP1odVWAB06tJ9Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=Iot787BECykWp2gtP3LBBfpkGun7l00fOPAElaA5BAiQCtwwTeI+lVecYMzKwAnts 4mcyF+D7fWht1j+3rEu3Cj1DeyPer4iHjAMiI9YUWs+kcZZlBXtr31rsdaxfYzyLlo W04h+ye22xoupObrmhPOhQ3wmdVoNLUsufgqTPam+umbVH0CCgAW87+XGI3BvdHj7B 6bGGqk9nn8pKjJ1FUWcQSS28fa1KRdLaD1dIgqoGtHBv8bFZMZk/H7/f1DvM+JP+ZX woAuP/pEtkO6VckSw7t2BXzkqiKH0LqFV0wwy5n6jYGwhxehp1ZAZDN0bLIEDFYrQR 6h+Szxrv3EMNQ== Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:34:18 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Chen-Yu Tsai , "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Heiko Stuebner , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Steven Price , Kunihiko Hayashi , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Provide FIFO sizes for DWMAC 1000 Message-ID: <20250206103418.GO554665@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250206_023425_028260_32044DFD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:40:17AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:38 AM Simon Horman wrote: ... > > I think the point is that someone needs to formally > > submit the revert. And I assume it should target the net tree. > > Russell sent one a couple hours ago, so I think we're covered. > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 05:44:58PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 05:38:24PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote: ... > > I think the point is that someone needs to formally > > submit the revert. And I assume it should target the net tree. > > For what I think is the third time today (fourth if you include the > actual patch...) > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/E1tfeyR-003YGJ-Gb@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk Thanks, I see it now.