linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
	Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Dohyun Kim <dohyunkim@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 22/26] bpf: Introduce rqspinlock kfuncs
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:43:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202502072155.DbOeX8Le-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206105435.2159977-23-memxor@gmail.com>

Hi Kumar,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 0abff462d802a352c87b7f5e71b442b09bf9cfff]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kumar-Kartikeya-Dwivedi/locking-Move-MCS-struct-definition-to-public-header/20250206-190258
base:   0abff462d802a352c87b7f5e71b442b09bf9cfff
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250206105435.2159977-23-memxor%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 22/26] bpf: Introduce rqspinlock kfuncs
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20250207 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250207/202502072155.DbOeX8Le-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250207/202502072155.DbOeX8Le-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502072155.DbOeX8Le-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from fs/timerfd.c:26:
   In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:94:
   In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:62:
   In file included from include/linux/security.h:35:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:33:
   In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/rqspinlock.h:27:
>> include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h:40:12: error: conflicting types for 'resilient_tas_spin_lock'
      40 | extern int resilient_tas_spin_lock(rqspinlock_t *lock, u64 timeout);
         |            ^
   arch/x86/include/asm/rqspinlock.h:17:12: note: previous declaration is here
      17 | extern int resilient_tas_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, u64 timeout);
         |            ^
   1 error generated.
--
   In file included from fs/splice.c:27:
   include/linux/mm_inline.h:47:41: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
      47 |         __mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
         |                                    ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
   include/linux/mm_inline.h:49:22: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
      49 |                                 NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
         |                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
   In file included from fs/splice.c:31:
   In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:94:
   In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:62:
   In file included from include/linux/security.h:35:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:33:
   In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/rqspinlock.h:27:
>> include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h:40:12: error: conflicting types for 'resilient_tas_spin_lock'
      40 | extern int resilient_tas_spin_lock(rqspinlock_t *lock, u64 timeout);
         |            ^
   arch/x86/include/asm/rqspinlock.h:17:12: note: previous declaration is here
      17 | extern int resilient_tas_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, u64 timeout);
         |            ^
   2 warnings and 1 error generated.
--
   In file included from fs/aio.c:20:
   In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:94:
   In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:62:
   In file included from include/linux/security.h:35:
   In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:33:
   In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/rqspinlock.h:27:
>> include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h:40:12: error: conflicting types for 'resilient_tas_spin_lock'
      40 | extern int resilient_tas_spin_lock(rqspinlock_t *lock, u64 timeout);
         |            ^
   arch/x86/include/asm/rqspinlock.h:17:12: note: previous declaration is here
      17 | extern int resilient_tas_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, u64 timeout);
         |            ^
   In file included from fs/aio.c:29:
   include/linux/mman.h:159:9: warning: division by zero is undefined [-Wdivision-by-zero]
     159 |                _calc_vm_trans(flags, MAP_SYNC,       VM_SYNC      ) |
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/mman.h:137:21: note: expanded from macro '_calc_vm_trans'
     137 |    : ((x) & (bit1)) / ((bit1) / (bit2))))
         |                     ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/mman.h:160:9: warning: division by zero is undefined [-Wdivision-by-zero]
     160 |                _calc_vm_trans(flags, MAP_STACK,      VM_NOHUGEPAGE) |
         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/mman.h:137:21: note: expanded from macro '_calc_vm_trans'
     137 |    : ((x) & (bit1)) / ((bit1) / (bit2))))
         |                     ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   2 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +/resilient_tas_spin_lock +40 include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h

c34e46edef2a89 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 2025-02-06  39  
7a9d3b27f7bf9c Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 2025-02-06 @40  extern int resilient_tas_spin_lock(rqspinlock_t *lock, u64 timeout);
7a9d3b27f7bf9c Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 2025-02-06  41  #ifdef CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
6516ce00a1482f Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 2025-02-06  42  extern int resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(rqspinlock_t *lock, u32 val, u64 timeout);
7a9d3b27f7bf9c Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 2025-02-06  43  #endif
6516ce00a1482f Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi 2025-02-06  44  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-06 10:54 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/26] Resilient Queued Spin Lock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/26] locking: Move MCS struct definition to public header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/26] locking: Move common qspinlock helpers to a private header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-07 23:21   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/26] locking: Allow obtaining result of arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/26] locking: Copy out qspinlock.c to rqspinlock.c Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/26] rqspinlock: Add rqspinlock.h header Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/26] rqspinlock: Drop PV and virtualization support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/26] rqspinlock: Add support for timeouts Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-10  9:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-11  4:55     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-11 10:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-11 18:00         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/26] rqspinlock: Protect pending bit owners from stalls Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/26] rqspinlock: Protect waiters in queue " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-10 10:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-13  6:20     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/26] rqspinlock: Protect waiters in trylock fallback " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/26] rqspinlock: Add deadlock detection and recovery Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-08  1:53   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-08  3:03     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-10 10:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-13  6:11     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-10 10:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/26] rqspinlock: Add a test-and-set fallback Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/26] rqspinlock: Add basic support for CONFIG_PARAVIRT Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/26] rqspinlock: Add helper to print a splat on timeout or deadlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/26] rqspinlock: Add macros for rqspinlock usage Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/26] rqspinlock: Add locktorture support Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/26] rqspinlock: Hardcode cond_acquire loops to asm-generic implementation Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-08  1:58   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-08  3:04     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-10  9:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-10 10:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-13  6:15       ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/26] rqspinlock: Add entry to Makefile, MAINTAINERS Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-07 14:14   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-07 14:45   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-08  0:43   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 19/26] bpf: Convert hashtab.c to rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-08  2:01   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-08  3:06     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 20/26] bpf: Convert percpu_freelist.c " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 21/26] bpf: Convert lpm_trie.c " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 22/26] bpf: Introduce rqspinlock kfuncs Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-07 13:43   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 23/26] bpf: Handle allocation failure in acquire_lock_state Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-08  2:04   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 24/26] bpf: Implement verifier support for rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-12  0:08   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-13  6:41     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 25/26] bpf: Maintain FIFO property for rqspinlock unlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 26/26] selftests/bpf: Add tests for rqspinlock Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-12  0:14   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-13  6:25     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-02-10  9:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/26] Resilient Queued Spin Lock Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-10  9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-10 10:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-11  4:37     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-11 10:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-11 18:33         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-13  9:59           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-14  2:37             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-04 10:46               ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-05  3:26                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-10  9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-10 19:16   ` Ankur Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202502072155.DbOeX8Le-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brho@google.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dohyunkim@google.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).