From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72439C021A9 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:17:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=DxapaJhXMHi1dkamuCkDcE4Mfsv6fMSJ0gziQn4ozoY=; b=VjklhVLBds9gZFNdtgfBkQqvYf 1g0MujNaELyFDIerk07MEpzAjDJqHAl34p7iwSm7oRm8VbBkFmKu3rqUesW5vczKlwn/TpXLtL8iF eRoQxI4kd1Shsv9sDsSTG8kNybwKGqCv+U9az4WVXnm3sI8F9aIAKTfNLW570iKPrM7wsnEGbh6zR a/vEZOZeaggSBigJszLAg2mV82NJ1duN02Usyg7b2RUnnCgyl3VJGh8ONL2J8tADxPBmIb0BcWj1i mlEu8Vzr/bCHff4hzHP1//PxHiUK1F5qKnm3PED0S9PkKTz7h+39VT9WxWS1/pAznOY6efw+1Ztar E2cTX9SQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thSjL-0000000HMzg-0d95; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:17:39 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thSXV-0000000HLFR-0yK0 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:05:26 +0000 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:05:22 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1739189123; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DxapaJhXMHi1dkamuCkDcE4Mfsv6fMSJ0gziQn4ozoY=; b=yEagp+lj2TIOwbHUOA0f1F+2J7YuakUp9/683voOGACDtw5iab8Hxq30Z3lr8Ey5xJ+KVN YfY94NlB7UIsJPauWBo0YCLLg85EfKgKDa0GPgsLErZ/vZpN32kqRyAVo8CUPHOkttEXSG bEspGEXqx06jsskW4WRmLwZY/X2xr/eVB29h9ubx6cIh7qr0tyjcfXkgfClZhIyoQaBSKo vRnBee3pfKmXG9GsEJdnQKIfrWWveU0CZSLGYtCusOgDA4xG27xLV31BAf0i+ophSGGUns B2Yqp1CZ5IP7umiaDeol1opT88F3keAsUddHJfpddRuh7raExBrOhVI8JtPmgA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1739189123; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DxapaJhXMHi1dkamuCkDcE4Mfsv6fMSJ0gziQn4ozoY=; b=FcGSnRX7Qd+JKTQZTRBam/OwH+Xede4wWJLiVQmU4YICNlc4o/NxAPgGbqcjkWOnjJpTS9 bH9aLXxMNl3sC0AA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon Cc: Ben Segall , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Shrikanth Hegde , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] arm64: Rely on generic printing of preemption model. Message-ID: <20250210120522.VvikzMr_@linutronix.de> References: <20250203141632.440554-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20250203141632.440554-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250203141632.440554-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250210_040525_415708_8338C70D X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.46 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2025-02-03 15:16:27 [+0100], To linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org wrote: > __die() invokes later show_regs() -> show_regs_print_info() which prints > the current preemption model. > Remove it from the initial line. > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Is it okay, to route this via the sched tree? Sebastian