From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B54FCC0219E for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:26:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=GJNAMbi5OSFWMgFQTSzpGQ2SGZpiqdmKVKO2S1+nBak=; b=07ZaTZ2pJWOb83kOgaA4MNyU0F 377JBYZ/YXSJjzCHEaZm4VP+JkYosMi/di8UZlVWCemg1NSyu1xbkJzg2LlYaddZhHT3rIU0uZ9nG EVaja8SMEgYc37I68plFWpkKqTahzzH58VVpl/nHP4ZIBQuAAx8MTgV27Mb1GeQl7uFs2An5ytIiw aRS4LMrJX58tE1TuXJj25mMgaXLQjjFWL8Q/D2rnXM4hNF8cRF+9K2Q2jwY4/lwiZrhzE9RAAeA4s GqwH0h9fGfVnwNJFerpmNqMLRPro5rhC4cjVHKmdkqpDFLNfXdyT0pAc7zX38jogTG/3TsmDtOHnU 15CSaXeA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tht5a-00000004V5t-1T1J; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:26:22 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thsrs-00000004RWm-2pHh for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:12:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948BA5C4A9F; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D1A0C4CEDD; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:12:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739290331; bh=XAmJT4YLfE1GmV8k7jA8oiQS+4DF9naVy5ayUlr3gfs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=h61IAedW0WZ/MSnh4rTUDSXKIomWuw+PhQyFn1Bo0Iay1e6eMzUc4VjG/3DvBRGBj Fnzb5J/AWtwRtlXkswp1kCPR4BtcdB4chZUT9ocyJsLswckVSPr5lRK5KQ5wcafPUj hl7++gfGrt7P+j+/LQ/8xb0Y2OsI3JWNWeOPH2mTtYiGfdXDS79wWqpLF5lE4gwx4d 6t0Y7HunqUgzh+y2o2p9IktjURicCZd/P/zU6Uiu/4fcer/JRx69rkUeG7/XPE8Mqm NLqE29AUFG5QA93bO4Rd6PU7s08akOLpf9hKoqx/FFhqIzlYpram+bv1gbrZx8Ttnl sYEXHipJ/xoRQ== Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:12:10 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Duje =?utf-8?Q?Mihanovi=C4=87?= , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9?= Codina , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: pxa: Use #pwm-cells = <3> Message-ID: <20250211161210.GA354180-robh@kernel.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250211_081212_760446_05A9B45E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.64 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 07:31:08PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:06:24PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello, > > > > this series' goal is to soften the special device-tree binding of > > marvel,pxa-pwm devices. This is the only binding that doesn't pass the > > line index as first parameter. > > > > Here the #pwm-cells value is bumped from 1 to 3, keeping compatibility > > with the old binding. > > > > The motivation for this was that Hervé sent a patch introducing pwm > > nexus nodes which don't work nicely with the marvel,pxa-pwm > > particularities. > > > > Changes since (implicit) v1, available at > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/cover.1738777221.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com: > > > > - Use #pwm-cells = <3> also in the binding example (*sigh*), pointed > > out by Rob > > - Add review, ack and test tags by Hervé Codina, Conor Dooley, Duje > > Mihanović and Daniel Mack. Thanks! > > > > I intend to take the first patch via my pwm tree. Assuming the pxa and > > device tree maintainers and bots are happy now: Dear pxa maintainers, > > please tell if I should take the whole series via pwm, or if you want to > > take patches #2 and #3. If the latter: Do you want to delay application > > or should I provide an immutable branch for patch #1? > > I applied patch #1 to > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next > now. > > I don't know yet what should happen to the two other patches, but maybe > it's a good idea to wait a bit anyhow to have 3 cells working for the > pxa driver for a kernel release or two before we switch it. The dts change will never work with a kernel without patch 1. You can somewhat mitigate that by backporting patch 1 to stable. If users aren't doing stable updates, they might not be doing dtb updates either... Rob