Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] reset: mpfs: use the auxiliary device creation helper

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1577 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 07:25:59AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:59 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> > > One think that's always felt a bit meh to me is this id number stuff,
> > > I just threw in 666 for meme value.
> >
> > :)
> >
> > > The whole thing seems super
> > > arbitrary, do any of the users of this helper actually put meaningful
> > > values into the id parameter?
> >
> > In example changes I've sent, no.
> >
> > In other simple usages (those using container_of()) of the auxiliary
> > bus, I think there are a few that uses 0 and 1 for 2 instances.
> >
> > I guess your question is "do we really need this parameter here ?"
> >
> > We could remove it and still address 90% of the original target.
> >
> > Keeping it leaves the door open in case the figure above does not hold
> > and it is pretty cheap to do. It could also enable drivers requiring an
> > IDA to use the helper, possibly.
> 
> FWIW, once you resolve the conflicts in drm-misc with ti-sn65dsi86
> you'll need the ID value. ;-)
> 
> There was a big-ol' discussion here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c2df6a903f87d4932586b25f1d3bd548fe8e6d1.1729180470.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
> 
> I eventually pushed v2 of the patch:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/7a68a0e3f927e26edca6040067fb653eb06efb79.1733840089.git.geert+renesas@glider.be

Think it makes sense to have a "simplified" wrapper for the cases where
the id has no meaning then? Not really a fan of the drivers coming up with
magic numbers.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]