[PATCH 10/14] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to limit NV support to nVHE

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

NV is hard. No kidding.

In order to make things simpler, we have established that NV would
support two mutually exclusive configurations:

- VHE-only, and supporting recursive virtualisation

- mVHE-only, and not supporting recursive virtualisation

For that purpose, introduce a new vcpu feature flag that denotes
the second configuration. We use this flag to limit the idregs
further.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c           | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 568bf858f3198..3bcab2a106c98 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct kvm_regs {
 #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS	5 /* VCPU uses address authentication */
 #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC	6 /* VCPU uses generic authentication */
 #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2		7 /* Support nested virtualization */
+#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0	8 /* Limit NV support to E2H RES0 */
 
 struct kvm_vcpu_init {
 	__u32 target;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 96d1d300e79f9..5ec5acb6310e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct kvm_s2_mmu *tmp;
 	int num_mmus, ret = 0;
 
+	if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0, kvm->arch.vcpu_features) &&
+	    !cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCR_NV1))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	/*
 	 * Let's treat memory allocation failures as benign: If we fail to
 	 * allocate anything, return an error and keep the allocated array
@@ -894,6 +898,9 @@ u64 limit_nv_id_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 reg, u64 val)
 			ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1_HPDS	|
 			ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1_VH	|
 			ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1_VMIDBits);
+		/* FEAT_E2H0 implies no VHE */
+		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0, kvm->arch.vcpu_features))
+			val &= ~ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1_VH;
 		break;
 
 	case SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1:
@@ -909,8 +916,25 @@ u64 limit_nv_id_reg(struct kvm *kvm, u32 reg, u64 val)
 		break;
 
 	case SYS_ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1:
-		val = SYS_FIELD_PREP_ENUM(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, NV_frac, NV2_ONLY);
-		val |= SYS_FIELD_PREP_ENUM(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, E2H0, NI_NV1);
+		/*
+		 * You get EITHER
+		 *
+		 * - FEAT_VHE without FEAT_E2H0
+		 * - FEAT_NV limited to FEAT_NV2
+		 * - HCR_EL2.NV1 being RES0
+		 *
+		 * OR
+		 *
+		 * - FEAT_E2H0 without FEAT_VHE nor FEAT_NV
+		 *
+		 * Life is too short for anything else.
+		 */
+		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_HAS_EL2_E2H0, kvm->arch.vcpu_features)) {
+			val = 0;
+		} else {
+			val = SYS_FIELD_PREP_ENUM(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, NV_frac, NV2_ONLY);
+			val |= SYS_FIELD_PREP_ENUM(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, E2H0, NI_NV1);
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1:
-- 
2.39.2