From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: ionela.voinescu@arm.com, yury.norov@gmail.com,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, sumitg@nvidia.com,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com,
lihuisong@huawei.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
ptsm@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: Utilize for_each_cpu_wrap for reference lookup
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:10:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220091015.2319901-1-beata.michalska@arm.com> (raw)
While searching for a reference CPU within a given policy,
arch_freq_get_on_cpu relies on cpumask_next_wrap to iterate over
all available CPUs and to ensure each is verified only once.
Recent changes to cpumask_next_wrap will handle the latter no more,
so switching to for_each_cpu_wrap, which preserves expected behavior
while ensuring compatibility with the updates.
Not to mention that when iterating over each CPU, using a dedicated
iterator is preferable to an open-coded loop.
Fixes: 16d1e27475f6 ("arm64: Provide an AMU-based version of arch_freq_get_on_cpu")
Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
---
v2:
Updated commit message
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index a09b0551ec59..9e3583720668 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) ||
time_is_before_jiffies(last_update + msecs_to_jiffies(AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS))) {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
- int ref_cpu = cpu;
+ int ref_cpu;
if (!policy)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -265,11 +265,15 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- do {
- ref_cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(ref_cpu, policy->cpus,
- start_cpu, true);
-
- } while (ref_cpu < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ref_cpu));
+ for_each_cpu_wrap(ref_cpu, policy->cpus, cpu + 1) {
+ if (ref_cpu == start_cpu) {
+ /* Prevent verifying same CPU twice */
+ ref_cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!idle_cpu(ref_cpu))
+ break;
+ }
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-20 9:10 Beata Michalska [this message]
2025-02-21 9:40 ` [PATCH v2] arm64: Utilize for_each_cpu_wrap for reference lookup Catalin Marinas
2025-02-21 19:03 ` Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250220091015.2319901-1-beata.michalska@arm.com \
--to=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptsm@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox