From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, maz@kernel.org,
joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
shuah@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
yury.norov@gmail.com, jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] iommufd: Implement sw_msi support natively
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:51:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250221145141.GA291164@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e13d23eeacd67c0a692fc468c85b483f4dd51c57.1740014950.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 05:31:41PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> +/*
> + * Get a iommufd_sw_msi_map for the msi physical address requested by the irq
> + * layer. The mapping to IOVA is global to the iommufd file descriptor, every
> + * domain that is attached to a device using the same MSI parameters will use
> + * the same IOVA.
> + */
> +static struct iommufd_sw_msi_map *
> +iommufd_sw_msi_get_map(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, phys_addr_t msi_addr,
> + phys_addr_t sw_msi_start)
> +{
This ends up being never called if !CONFIG_IRQ_MSI_IOMMU because the
sw_msi doesn't exist.
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_device_to_id, "IOMMUFD");
* domain that is attached to a device using the same MSI parameters will use
* the same IOVA.
*/
-static struct iommufd_sw_msi_map *
+static __maybe_unused struct iommufd_sw_msi_map *
iommufd_sw_msi_get_map(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, phys_addr_t msi_addr,
phys_addr_t sw_msi_start)
{
Fixed it up
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-21 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-20 1:31 [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu: Add MSI mapping support with nested SMMU (Part-1 core) Nicolin Chen
2025-02-20 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] genirq/msi: Store the IOMMU IOVA directly in msi_desc instead of iommu_cookie Nicolin Chen
2025-02-21 9:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-21 11:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2025-02-21 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-21 14:00 ` Joerg Roedel
2025-02-21 14:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-20 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] genirq/msi: Refactor iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg() Nicolin Chen
2025-02-21 9:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-20 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iommu: Make iommu_dma_prepare_msi() into a generic operation Nicolin Chen
2025-02-21 15:39 ` Robin Murphy
2025-02-21 16:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-27 11:21 ` Robin Murphy
2025-02-27 15:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-27 17:46 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-27 19:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-20 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] irqchip: Have CONFIG_IRQ_MSI_IOMMU be selected by irqchips that need it Nicolin Chen
2025-02-21 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-21 14:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-20 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu: Turn fault_data to iommufd private pointer Nicolin Chen
2025-02-20 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-20 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iommufd: Implement sw_msi support natively Nicolin Chen
2025-02-21 14:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-02-27 19:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-20 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu: Turn iova_cookie to dma-iommu private pointer Nicolin Chen
2025-02-20 17:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-21 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-21 15:23 ` Robin Murphy
2025-02-21 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-26 2:25 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-26 17:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-26 18:57 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-02-26 19:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-21 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu: Add MSI mapping support with nested SMMU (Part-1 core) Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250221145141.GA291164@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).