linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dw-rockchip: hide broken ATS capability
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 21:38:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250222160837.mropn3laiyv3acaa@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221202646.395252-4-cassel@kernel.org>

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 09:26:48PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> When running the rk3588 in endpoint mode, with an Intel host with IOMMU
> enabled, the host side prints:
> DMAR: VT-d detected Invalidation Time-out Error: SID 0
> 
> When running the rk3588 in endpoint mode, with an AMD host with IOMMU
> enabled, the host side prints:
> iommu ivhd0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IOTLB_INV_TIMEOUT device=63:00.0 address=0x42b5b01a0]
> 
> Usually, to handle these issues, we add a quirk for the PCI vendor and
> device ID in drivers/pci/quirks.c with quirk_no_ats(). That is because
> we cannot usually modify the capabilities on the EP side.
> 
> In this case, we can modify the capabilties on the EP side. Thus, hide the
> broken ATS capability on rk3588 when running in EP mode. That way,
> we don't need any quirk on the host side, and we see no errors on the host
> side, and we can run pci_endpoint_test successfully, with the IOMMU
> enabled on the host side.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index 836ea10eafbb..2be005c1a161 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -242,6 +242,51 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops rockchip_pcie_host_ops = {
>  	.init = rockchip_pcie_host_init,
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * ATS does not work on rk3588 when running in EP mode.
> + * After a host has enabled ATS on the EP side, it will send an IOTLB
> + * invalidation request to the EP side. The rk3588 will never send a completion
> + * back and eventually the host will print an IOTLB_INV_TIMEOUT error, and the
> + * EP will not be operational. If we hide the ATS cap, things work as expected.
> + */
> +static void rockchip_pcie_ep_hide_broken_ats_cap_rk3588(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> +	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> +	unsigned int spcie_cap_offset, next_cap_offset;
> +	u32 spcie_cap_header, next_cap_header;
> +
> +	/* only hide the ATS cap for rk3588 running in EP mode */
> +	if (!of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "rockchip,rk3588-pcie-ep"))
> +		return;

Compatible checks always tend to extend. So please use a boolean flag to
identify the quirk in 'struct rockchip_pcie_of_data' and set it in
'rockchip_pcie_ep_of_data_rk3588'. This way, other SoCs could also reuse the
flag if required.

> +
> +	spcie_cap_offset = dw_pcie_find_ext_capability(pci, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SECPCI);
> +	if (!spcie_cap_offset)
> +		return;
> +
> +	spcie_cap_header = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, spcie_cap_offset);
> +	next_cap_offset = PCI_EXT_CAP_NEXT(spcie_cap_header);
> +
> +	next_cap_header = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, next_cap_offset);
> +	if (PCI_EXT_CAP_ID(next_cap_header) != PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ATS)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* clear next ptr */
> +	spcie_cap_header &= ~GENMASK(31, 20);
> +
> +	/* set next ptr to next ptr of ATS_CAP */
> +	spcie_cap_header |= next_cap_header & GENMASK(31, 20);
> +
> +	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> +	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, spcie_cap_offset, spcie_cap_header);
> +	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);

This code is mostly generic. So please move it to pcie-designware-ep.c. The
function should just accept two CAP IDs (prev and target) and hide the target
capability. Like,

	dw_pcie_hide_ext_capability(pci, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SECPCI,
				    PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ATS);

Its too bad that we cannot traverse back from the target capability. We could
open code dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability() to keep track of the prev_cap_offset
though.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-22 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250221202646.395252-3-cassel@kernel.org>
2025-02-21 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dw-rockchip: hide broken ATS capability Niklas Cassel
2025-02-22  0:00   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-22  7:40     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-02-24 14:18     ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-02-22  7:38   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-02-22 16:08   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2025-03-07 12:29     ` Niklas Cassel
2025-02-25  1:35   ` Shawn Lin
2025-02-25 12:27     ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250222160837.mropn3laiyv3acaa@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).