linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	cristian.marussi@arm.com, saravanak@google.com,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: scmi: Introduce compatible string
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:15:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250227031551.GC11411@nxa18884-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z79NOeyWzfRio8qs@bogus>

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:19:53PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:09:45AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>> > Quote Sudeep's reply"
>> > I am not blocking you. What I mentioned is I don't agree that DT can be used
>> > to resolve this issue, but I don't have time or alternate solution ATM. So
>> > if you propose DT based solution and the maintainers agree for the proposed
>> > bindings I will take a look and help you to make that work. But I will raise
>> > any objections I may have if the proposal has issues mainly around the
>> > compatibility and ease of maintenance.
>> > "
>>
>> This all looks to me like SCMI has failed to provide common interfaces.
>>
>
>We can look into this if having such common interface can solve this problem.
>
>> I'm indifferent. If everyone involved thinks adding compatibles will
>> solve whatever the issues are, then it's going to be fine with me
>> (other than the issue above). It doesn't seem like you have that, so I
>> don't know that I'd keep going down this path.
>
>Sorry if I was ambiguous with my stance as quoted above. For me, 2 devices
>pointing to the same node seems implementation issue rather than fixing/
>working around by extending DT bindings like this $subject patch is
>attempting.
>
>If you disagree with that and think 2 devices in the kernel shouldn't
>point to the same device tree node, then yes I see this is right approach
>to take. ATM I don't know which is correct and what are other developer's
>include DT maintainer opinion on this. I just didn't like the way Peng
>was trying to solve it with some block/allow list which wouldn't have
>fixed the issue or just created new ones.

With compatible string, no need block/allow list anymore I think.

But honestly I have not spend efforts on do driver changes to support
compatible string. If in the end we all agree on the proposal,
I could start on driver changes.

Thanks,
Peng

>
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-27  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26  9:44 [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: scmi: Introduce compatible string Peng Fan (OSS)
2025-02-26 16:09 ` Rob Herring
2025-02-26 17:19   ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-27  3:15     ` Peng Fan [this message]
2025-02-27  9:12       ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-27  3:09   ` Peng Fan
2025-02-28 13:34     ` Rob Herring
2025-02-28 14:04       ` Sudeep Holla
2025-02-28 14:17         ` Rob Herring
2025-03-03  4:35           ` Peng Fan
2025-02-27 11:48 ` Cristian Marussi
2025-03-03  4:27   ` Peng Fan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250227031551.GC11411@nxa18884-linux \
    --to=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).