From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Cyril Brulebois" <kibi@debian.org>,
"Stanimir Varbanov" <svarbanov@suse.de>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, jim2101024@gmail.com,
"Florian Fainelli" <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI: brcmstb: Fix error path upon call of regulator_bulk_get()
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:02:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304173209.bq2lpijsea7aufpu@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+-6iNzvqnZB=7kRqUm5ie6245AM5ObeVmMNQ_S4AtMLD0jKQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 12:24:56PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 12:07 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:55:05AM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 10:03 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > > <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:39:32PM -0500, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > > > > If regulator_bulk_get() returns an error, no regulators are created and we
> > > > > need to set their number to zero. If we do not do this and the PCIe
> > > > > link-up fails, regulator_bulk_free() will be invoked and effect a panic.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also print out the error value, as we cannot return an error upwards as
> > > > > Linux will WARN on an error from add_bus().
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 9e6be018b263 ("PCI: brcmstb: Enable child bus device regulators from DT")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 3 ++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > > > index e0b20f58c604..56b49d3cae19 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > > > @@ -1416,7 +1416,8 @@ static int brcm_pcie_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > > > >
> > > > > ret = regulator_bulk_get(dev, sr->num_supplies, sr->supplies);
> > > > > if (ret) {
> > > > > - dev_info(dev, "No regulators for downstream device\n");
> > > > > + dev_info(dev, "Did not get regulators; err=%d\n", ret);
> > > >
> > > > Why is this dev_info() instead of dev_err()?
> > >
> > > I will change this.
> > > >
> > > > > + pcie->sr = NULL;
> > > >
> > > > Why can't you set 'pcie->sr' after successfull regulator_bulk_get()?
> > >
> > > Not sure I understand -- it is already set before a successful
> > > regulator_bulk_get() call.
> >
> > Didn't I say 'after'?
>
> Sorry, I misinterpreted your question. I can change it but it would
> just be churn because a new commit is going to refactor this function.
> However,
> I can set pcie->num_regulators "after" in the new commit.
>
If a new patch is going to change the beahvior, then I'm fine with it for now.
After all, this series is already merged.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 17:39 [PATCH v2 0/8] PCI: brcmstb: Misc small tweaks and fixes Jim Quinlan
2025-02-14 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] PCI: brcmstb: Set gen limitation before link, not after Jim Quinlan
2025-02-20 17:27 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-03-04 14:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] PCI: brcmstb: Write to internal register to change link cap Jim Quinlan
2025-02-20 17:28 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-03-04 14:54 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] PCI: brcmstb: Do not assume that reg field starts at LSB Jim Quinlan
2025-02-20 17:29 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-03-04 14:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] PCI: brcmstb: Fix error path upon call of regulator_bulk_get() Jim Quinlan
2025-02-20 17:29 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-03-03 18:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-04 14:49 ` Jim Quinlan
2025-03-06 15:24 ` Jim Quinlan
2025-03-06 16:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-04 15:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-04 16:55 ` Jim Quinlan
2025-03-04 17:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-04 17:24 ` Jim Quinlan
2025-03-04 17:32 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2025-03-04 17:54 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-02-14 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] PCI: brcmstb: Fix potential premature regulator disabling Jim Quinlan
2025-02-20 17:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-03-04 15:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] PCI: brcmstb: Use same constant table for config space access Jim Quinlan
2025-02-20 18:14 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-03-04 15:08 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-04 16:37 ` Jim Quinlan
2025-03-04 16:58 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-04 17:37 ` Jim Quinlan
2025-03-05 5:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] PCI: brcmstb: Make two changes in MDIO register fields Jim Quinlan
2025-02-20 18:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-03-04 15:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 17:39 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] PCI: brcmstb: Clarify conversion of irq_domain_set_info() param Jim Quinlan
2025-02-20 18:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-03-04 15:10 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-01 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] PCI: brcmstb: Misc small tweaks and fixes Krzysztof Wilczyński
2025-03-04 16:10 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304173209.bq2lpijsea7aufpu@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
--cc=kibi@debian.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=svarbanov@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox