From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Meghana Malladi <m-malladi@ti.com>,
Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@siemens.com>, Lee Trager <lee@trager.us>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <srk@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add ICSSG FW Stats
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 08:39:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250307083959.33098949@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3931a391-3967-4260-a104-4eb313810c0d@ti.com>
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:00:40 +0530 MD Danish Anwar wrote:
> > Thanks for the docs, it looks good. Now, do all of these get included
> > in the standard stats returned by icssg_ndo_get_stats64 ?
> > That's the primary source of information for the user regarding packet
> > loss.
>
> No, these are not reported via icssg_ndo_get_stats64.
>
> .ndo_get_stats64 populates stats that are part of `struct
> rtnl_link_stats64`. icssg_ndo_get_stats64 populates those stats wherever
> applicable. These firmware stats are not same as the ones defined in
> `icssg_ndo_get_stats64` hence they are not populated. They are not
> standard stats, they will be dumped by `ethtool -S`. Wherever there is a
> standard stats, I will make sure it gets dumped from the standard
> interface instead of `ethtool -S`
>
> Only below stats are included in the standard stats returned by
> icssg_ndo_get_stats64
> - rx_packets
> - rx_bytes
> - tx_packets
> - tx_bytes
> - rx_crc_errors
> - rx_over_errors
> - rx_multicast_frames
Yes, but if the stats you're adding here relate to packets sent /
destined to the host which were lost you should include them
in the aggregate rx_errors / rx_dropped / tx_errors / tx_dropped.
I understand that there's unlikely to be a 1:1 match with specific
stats.
> > This gets called by icssg_ndo_get_stats64() which is under RCU
>
> Yes, this does get called by icssg_ndo_get_stats64(). Apart from that
> there is a workqueue (`icssg_stats_work_handler`) that calls this API
> periodically and updates the emac->stats and emac->pa_stats arrays.
>
> > protection and nothing else. I don't see any locking here, and
>
> There is no locking here. I don't think this is related to the patch.
> The API emac_update_hardware_stats() updates all the stats supported by
> ICSSG not just standard stats.
Yes, I'm saying you should send a separate fix, not really related or
blocking this patch (unless they conflict)
> > I hope the regmap doesn't sleep. cat /proc/net/dev to test.
> > You probably need to send some fixes to net.
>
> I checked cat /proc/net/dev and the stats shown there are not related to
> the stats I am introducing in this series.
You misunderstood. I pointed that you so you can check on a debug
kernel if there are any warnings (e.g. something tries to sleep
since /proc/net/dev read is under RCU lock).
> The fix could be to add a lock in this function, but we have close to 90
> stats and this function is called not only from icssg_ndo_get_stats64()
> but from emac_get_ethtool_stats(). The function also gets called
> periodically (Every 25 Seconds for 1G Link). I think every time locking
> 90 regmap_reads() could result in performance degradation.
Correctness comes first.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 11:16 [PATCH net-next v2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add ICSSG FW Stats MD Danish Anwar
2025-03-07 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-07 10:30 ` MD Danish Anwar
2025-03-07 16:39 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-03-14 6:45 ` MD Danish Anwar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250307083959.33098949@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=diogo.ivo@siemens.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@trager.us \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m-malladi@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).