From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL DRIVER),
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org (open list:SAMSUNG THERMAL
DRIVER),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG
S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers/thermal/exynos: Refactor clk_sec initialization inside SOC-specific case
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:04:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250310143450.8276-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250310143450.8276-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Refactor the initialization of the clk_sec clock to be inside the
SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO case. It ensures that the clk_sec clock
is only initialized for the specified SOC and not for other SOCs,
thereby simplifying the code. The clk_sec clock is used by the TMU
for GPU on the Exynos 542x platform.
Removed redundant IS_ERR() checks for the clk_sec clock since error
handling is already managed internally by clk_unprepare() functions.
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
---
v4: Fix the aligment of code clk for clk_prepare in proper if/else block.
update the commit for clk_sec used.
checked to goto clean up all the clks are proper.
drop IS_ERR() check for clk_sec.
v3: improve the commit message.
---
drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 37 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index 47a99b3c53958..3657920de0004 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -1037,29 +1037,30 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
data->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "tmu_apbif");
- if (IS_ERR(data->clk))
+ if (IS_ERR(data->clk)) {
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk), "Failed to get clock\n");
-
- data->clk_sec = devm_clk_get(dev, "tmu_triminfo_apbif");
- if (IS_ERR(data->clk_sec)) {
- if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO)
- return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk_sec),
- "Failed to get triminfo clock\n");
} else {
- ret = clk_prepare(data->clk_sec);
+ ret = clk_prepare(data->clk);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
return ret;
}
}
- ret = clk_prepare(data->clk);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
- goto err_clk_sec;
- }
-
switch (data->soc) {
+ case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO:
+ data->clk_sec = devm_clk_get(dev, "tmu_triminfo_apbif");
+ if (IS_ERR(data->clk_sec)) {
+ ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk_sec),
+ "Failed to get clk_sec clock\n");
+ goto err_clk;
+ }
+ ret = clk_prepare(data->clk_sec);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare clk_sec clock\n");
+ goto err_clk_sec;
+ }
+ break;
case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433:
case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7:
data->sclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "tmu_sclk");
@@ -1112,11 +1113,10 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
err_sclk:
clk_disable_unprepare(data->sclk);
+err_clk_sec:
+ clk_unprepare(data->clk_sec);
err_clk:
clk_unprepare(data->clk);
-err_clk_sec:
- if (!IS_ERR(data->clk_sec))
- clk_unprepare(data->clk_sec);
return ret;
}
@@ -1128,8 +1128,7 @@ static void exynos_tmu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_disable_unprepare(data->sclk);
clk_unprepare(data->clk);
- if (!IS_ERR(data->clk_sec))
- clk_unprepare(data->clk_sec);
+ clk_unprepare(data->clk_sec);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 14:34 [PATCH v4 0/4] Exynos Thermal code improvement Anand Moon
2025-03-10 14:34 ` Anand Moon [this message]
2025-03-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers/thermal/exynos: Refactor clk_sec initialization inside SOC-specific case Anand Moon
2025-03-10 14:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drivers/thermal/exymos: Remove redundant IS_ERR() checks for clk_sec clock Anand Moon
2025-03-10 14:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] drivers/thermal/exymos: Fixed the efuse min max value for exynos5422 Anand Moon
2025-03-10 14:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] drivers/thermal/exymos: Use guard notation when acquiring mutex Anand Moon
2025-03-11 17:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-12 14:59 ` Anand Moon
2025-03-13 7:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-13 10:35 ` Anand Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250310143450.8276-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--to=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).