From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05FCC282DE for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:45:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=wvmdDKCoDaEru8Dl5f0QNShdKE18WMOAWrVkw03H/mM=; b=whV8h64RC20yRUVZqkiRcmOi+b aI9CCiEimrGGSbAm4/FyTKIHCM+SIP3R3oNR+WQXJDR0ERyY694ePoPgUoRLOjnu98NpN2giYiAKu /UFi7YN2B8GaArdybDCQvEvzzUl8+5BNZSqwej8cqYyhyBczXpCDKAoCtE3f4WRf+ssbSrZp1mFTO WI2hVGYbp4y1YcKnI8k9RE/9rioL6iFwD6Y7hP7AOG5LZssjGX9Acbe7cvJXCvhw2so3IjxnWKhLN 5T/QcLN5EDlFK79AJbwHP5rgDh7PLBmYZG79q1h0ZOjX3UGrj9UrKlCaT16M6Rw7n/nFj0NQkANWJ amEANZcQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1trgG6-00000003Ny7-2pEl; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:45:42 +0000 Received: from desiato.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1trfwx-00000003LdC-0duS for linux-arm-kernel@bombadil.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:25:55 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type :MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=wvmdDKCoDaEru8Dl5f0QNShdKE18WMOAWrVkw03H/mM=; b=bZS+hZydiDA1XeLZPPyJu41Z7B YWE8c3DOqu4JcnhvEpHkQeXc7J++yxNYihSzdJ4J/AQKapI5oK8LW5fLk7OgEw5+8dyrRGFf6imDE 4dducvRy4B5P6jp6HHeak3vynOYaEzkZod5aQNE69MyYEz/o9hW9j6R9oygBB2pqggDlYGgKXK65A wLnMYNEmlVbestgEpYQTkbULIMV9XwU9tfF9mxBYSCOhOXn031dcPl+enVjsbu9l71n2BM96KEryL 6AhY5UUh/8AuM5MQX5G5j1a6rzlFQmR71hQ50mqCVxOYhmlLfU36jB0z+c6HBeUmgzuY6/4H85y9h 0pFIhlUg==; Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1trfwu-00000001vB8-1L29 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:25:54 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DF45C5885; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B96DC4CEE5; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:25:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741623949; bh=wvmdDKCoDaEru8Dl5f0QNShdKE18WMOAWrVkw03H/mM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XkBokQ9OhC2gPVk+5VQsLxbrKnkd6hnpAJBzbrTPjTKHo9Qkv2ZlOFtBRfkWIJh79 439Uil74VB7VwaVNalpI156hOq2CTmlpl+36UHbs5vFrDtjRBTDQpCP/Vqc2/GOr3y Vpsf7rP2BKWXM/TOEUa8lf+Pv6Q9wgECGM+SgN4bSUnQeSLHKyWYuAMFUclWD5pm+X ixex9jj4Y7uLs6j7qVbMirhNG7kI0TL1i/LiNagCm7FBjMjGTlpiT3tGvboUZEyVgF UaG1SY2hr7GsEdN50+QPg+BEWQD0IP8dobwL6av9eClZS+UhXHhvD3YCgjNsZ1XY9o 9nJh5lfAezF0w== Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:25:41 +0100 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jacob Keller Cc: Meghana Malladi , Richard Cochran , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Roger Quadros , Subject: Re: Plan to validate supported flags in PTP core (Was: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] Fixes for perout configuration in IEP driver) Message-ID: <20250310172541.30896e20@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250219062701.995955-1-m-malladi@ti.com> <415f755d-18a6-4c81-a1a7-b75d54a5886a@intel.com> <20250220172410.025b96d6@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250310_162552_548543_79BD6E05 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:48:27 -0800 Jacob Keller wrote: > Would a series with individual patches for the 3 special cases + one > patch to handle all the drivers that have no explicit flag check be > acceptable? Or should I do individual patches for each driver and just > break the series up? Or are we ok with just fixing this in next with the > .supported_extts_flags change? A mass rejection of unsupported settings feels like a net-next material in general. Handling the more complex cases individually and the rest in a big patch makes sense.