From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7021CC28B2E for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:33:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=s1apLwXpfvTkWHh+6/5h2TiHju9pcs5d/PyiuJeHcyg=; b=qbteaJ8gnPqzcfxQCbG9EsHwcO HW+22Pw381lOFPC+BDqHu7kSYOvcgZznR7ivw5zSBgOK4tkAZDWfvpqLkHVRZ2BDYvVftQHZYfZnL 2PIh75wpcKXEEJ97EbjYyKrcF8s84Cj4xf/ERgH7FwfPTW0r+TxrbKUa7tFezHiZtg7jiPhqK/PH6 XnhXA/X8lWCnzBwN39DWTL9pwK52Y4VQB8sYH7rFiS5GLEcZjRybRTc5/NqoX32fxI1Zqf+lGpRKT ZlUlHixs+QY4Bncs9EnGoZNuObdPf4a3OfxNeok1mp6U7Zwq8jfAge/NxC1hXpfdediQ3hvpWh/uL 6IWe1zIQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1trv3b-000000050be-3dd8; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:33:47 +0000 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::226]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1trv0a-000000050H2-2iPS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:30:51 +0000 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E359D442D7; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:30:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1741681836; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=s1apLwXpfvTkWHh+6/5h2TiHju9pcs5d/PyiuJeHcyg=; b=kIvSIzH4kJatWgUgEJ/ehWNJgd5eY/pHjJ8Eo+UBMSKZ7o/Tu1XnxNisVpdGgkl4N2SZH3 Y5p07kTQhnaD7ig2BQG6R8hVVqEVK0emh2Rfm3CoN/ZMKgHcvceKkY/0NFjRkgdqhzhMq0 Bj7L70Lt/SR289hrtzbhqbTHuazZzueaurhmFPpYD/P+7j0VJn/9VhK/81LJ5x60IIe6Q9 CiSUTVOXh6wh9oN2OP5qYp4eOGxHHYujfg9Wj9xKmOA5WLJh95DnfRdngPP0iglYgExbG/ B6mD58s9tWiDnas9fiDHZs10Xlu1gcCcLbzzg2UmOBS9WWCJxC7ZoFAcbfyprQ== Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:30:27 +0100 From: Kory Maincent To: Choong Yong Liang Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Dan Carpenter , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] stmmac: intel: Fix warning message for return value in intel_tsn_lane_is_available() Message-ID: <20250311093027.4546e766@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> In-Reply-To: <3bc2cc11-3a87-479e-a0e0-c593e3214540@linux.intel.com> References: <20250310050835.808870-1-yong.liang.choong@linux.intel.com> <20250310152014.1d593255@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> <3bc2cc11-3a87-479e-a0e0-c593e3214540@linux.intel.com> Organization: bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduvddujeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuifetpfffkfdpucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtqhertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpefmohhrhicuofgrihhntggvnhhtuceokhhorhihrdhmrghinhgtvghnthessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfdutdefvedtudegvefgvedtgfdvhfdtueeltefffefffffhgfetkedvfeduieeinecuffhomhgrihhnpegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmnecukfhppeegiedrudekkedrvdefledruddtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepgeeirddukeekrddvfeelrddutddphhgvlhhopehkmhgrihhntggvnhhtqdgirffuqddufedqjeefledtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepkhhorhihrdhmrghinhgtvghnthessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepudegpdhrtghpthhtohephihonhhgrdhlihgrnhhgrdgthhhoohhngheslhhinhhugidrihhnthgvlhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhgvfidonhgvthguvghvsehluhhnnhdrtghhpdhrtghpthhtohepuggrvhgvmhesuggrvhgvmhhlohhfthdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopegvughumhgriigvthesghhoo hhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhusggrsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehprggsvghnihesrhgvughhrghtrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepmhgtohhquhgvlhhinhdrshhtmhefvdesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrlhgvgigrnhgurhgvrdhtohhrghhuvgesfhhoshhsrdhsthdrtghomh X-GND-Sasl: kory.maincent@bootlin.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250311_013041_317960_A5993A7C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.29 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:33:42 +0800 Choong Yong Liang wrote: > On 10/3/2025 10:20 pm, Kory Maincent wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:08:35 +0800 > > Choong Yong Liang wrote: > > =20 > >> Fix the warning "warn: missing error code? 'ret'" in the > >> intel_tsn_lane_is_available() function. > >> > >> The function now returns 0 to indicate that a TSN lane was found and > >> returns -EINVAL when it is not found. > >> > >> Fixes: a42f6b3f1cc1 ("net: stmmac: configure SerDes according to the > >> interface mode") > >> Signed-off-by: Choong Yong Liang = =20 > >=20 > > This patch is a fix it should go net instead net-next. > > Could you resend the patch with net prefix? > >=20 > > Reviewed-by: Kory Maincent > >=20 > > Thank you! =20 >=20 > Hi Kory, >=20 > Thank you for your feedback. I understand that the patch is a fix. Howeve= r,=20 > since the code is not yet in the 'net' tree, we are unable to apply the f= ix=20 > there. >=20 > I'm not sure if there is another way to handle this fix other than sendin= g=20 > it to the 'net-next' tree. I would appreciate any guidance you might have= =20 > on this matter. Oh, my bad! In that case you are right to send it to net-next. Sorry for the noise. Regards, --=20 K=C3=B6ry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com