From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8995C36000 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:38:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References: List-Owner; bh=BqNAlk7rXAlcVOFBgEHRS+hiVmaJg6AYHU2f42U4Q6g=; b=uUpxTWwaFoXnBx 658m3Jp81lkrKUzVHny05/oJbyQ7bofD+n0kmzdPP3grE5AJ3V7tAHf+cGMTRUFzxqxCH2eaU9IX8 xWCuGqIcJ746mht0qTWpbn0UZ1vF+Ua+6Uu/qLsZHEJsjavSHL+bofvp51FZpmfUL2gzniNMCIIMK W6ZvjQnqLt7LlOG1Q8Rs0qHMtmwiAA0EAahBg6mE6QMpDQ6CmzYlA8uwRBKj91f0fsL7476+J1hTi neaqaSITGT0zU7oYCay/V8rldAzZ2DzsPcHk2YbtzchLOeLmpPH6MqbI4YHcGTP6DuDu8kCDOMih3 6dJ5GurYZr/mkNBTauuQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tvfNo-0000000FXJK-17kA; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:38:08 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tvfIZ-0000000FW6m-0Vk8; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:32:44 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8A5C6DBE; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF8A2C4CEE3; Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:32:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742574762; bh=BqNAlk7rXAlcVOFBgEHRS+hiVmaJg6AYHU2f42U4Q6g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=GWoVjPcUuHiSvan9BqoVytjybeH1rUYg6Q+hO/Vd8LJ81fsr9P2d4YUocxgn0yxOZ vczmYLN/eMzwLzMenjR6rL9ISgVan1byWsapnm7/+8jovi5/0TVoqOBzphXfdRZP/9 w+hwUmW8i4EEd0yY3RiyZkFu9lz2xJVZwyv2ES9vVQuf6Lm2/kBK81xGm5Pwrkm1uY 4f+tNNn3LiTNdgSJWwIb+XaXhGXbSVt3Vldxsng0Q2xexz7cGxbu1Ykk7VDMy6U4Pz 66ndKB4t+2pqvev2lAQwD9ltJHIZmKS5WyIyZdgCMEdKE+ve/LRVNWSdJhzdeDZcFT kQeu5OA4CGdZg== Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 11:32:40 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jingoo Han , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Karthikeyan Mitran , Hou Zhiqiang , Toan Le , Joyce Ooi , Jim Quinlan , Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Florian Fainelli , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Ryder Lee , Jianjun Wang , Michal Simek , Daire McNamara , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/57] irqdomain: pci: Switch to of_fwnode_handle() Message-ID: <20250321163240.GA1130095@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250319092951.37667-8-jirislaby@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250321_093243_202327_B89E08ED X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.53 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:29:00AM +0100, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: > of_node_to_fwnode() is irqdomain's reimplementation of the "officially" > defined of_fwnode_handle(). The former is in the process of being > removed, so use the latter instead. I'm fine with these and happy to apply via the PCI tree, but it sounds like you're planning a v3 with a few updates, so I'll hold off for now: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4bc0e1ca-a523-424a-8759-59e353317fba@kernel.org