From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] KVM: selftests: Add a KVM_IRQFD test to verify uniqueness requirements
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 13:44:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250401204425.904001-13-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250401204425.904001-1-seanjc@google.com>
Add a selftest to verify that eventfd+irqfd bindings are globally unique,
i.e. that KVM doesn't allow multiple irqfds to bind to a single eventfd,
even across VMs.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 4 +
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/irqfd_test.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/irqfd_test.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index f773f8f99249..9e5128d9f22c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += dirty_log_perf_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += guest_memfd_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += guest_print_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += hardware_disable_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += irqfd_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += kvm_page_table_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += memslot_modification_stress_test
@@ -163,6 +164,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += dirty_log_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += dirty_log_perf_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += guest_print_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += get-reg-list
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += irqfd_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += kvm_page_table_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += memslot_modification_stress_test
@@ -185,6 +187,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/ucontrol_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += demand_paging_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += dirty_log_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += guest_print_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += irqfd_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += kvm_page_table_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += rseq_test
@@ -199,6 +202,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += demand_paging_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += dirty_log_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += get-reg-list
TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += guest_print_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += irqfd_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_binary_stats_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_create_max_vcpus
TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_page_table_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/irqfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/irqfd_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..286f2b15fde6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/irqfd_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <sys/sysinfo.h>
+
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+
+static struct kvm_vm *vm1;
+static struct kvm_vm *vm2;
+static int __eventfd;
+static bool done;
+
+/*
+ * KVM de-assigns based on eventfd *and* GSI, but requires unique eventfds when
+ * assigning (the API isn't symmetrical). Abuse the oddity and use a per-task
+ * GSI base to avoid false failures due to cross-task de-assign, i.e. so that
+ * the secondary doesn't de-assign the primary's eventfd and cause assign to
+ * unexpectedly succeed on the primary.
+ */
+#define GSI_BASE_PRIMARY 0x20
+#define GSI_BASE_SECONDARY 0x30
+
+static void juggle_eventfd_secondary(struct kvm_vm *vm, int eventfd)
+{
+ int r, i;
+
+ /*
+ * The secondary task can encounter EBADF since the primary can close
+ * the eventfd at any time. And because the primary can recreate the
+ * eventfd, at the safe fd in the file table, the secondary can also
+ * encounter "unexpected" success, e.g. if the close+recreate happens
+ * between the first and second assignments. The secondary's role is
+ * mostly to antagonize KVM, not to detect bugs.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ r = __kvm_irqfd(vm, GSI_BASE_SECONDARY, eventfd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!r || errno == EBUSY || errno == EBADF,
+ "Wanted success, EBUSY, or EBADF, r = %d, errno = %d",
+ r, errno);
+
+ /* De-assign should succeed unless the eventfd was closed. */
+ r = __kvm_irqfd(vm, GSI_BASE_SECONDARY + i, eventfd, KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!r || errno == EBADF,
+ "De-assign should succeed unless the fd was closed");
+ }
+}
+
+static void *secondary_irqfd_juggler(void *ign)
+{
+ while (!READ_ONCE(done)) {
+ juggle_eventfd_secondary(vm1, READ_ONCE(__eventfd));
+ juggle_eventfd_secondary(vm2, READ_ONCE(__eventfd));
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void juggle_eventfd_primary(struct kvm_vm *vm, int eventfd)
+{
+ int r1, r2;
+
+ /*
+ * At least one of the assigns should fail. KVM disallows assigning a
+ * single eventfd to multiple GSIs (or VMs), so it's possible that both
+ * assignments can fail, too.
+ */
+ r1 = __kvm_irqfd(vm, GSI_BASE_PRIMARY, eventfd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!r1 || errno == EBUSY,
+ "Wanted success or EBUSY, r = %d, errno = %d", r1, errno);
+
+ r2 = __kvm_irqfd(vm, GSI_BASE_PRIMARY + 1, eventfd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r1 || (r2 && errno == EBUSY),
+ "Wanted failure (EBUSY), r1 = %d, r2 = %d, errno = %d",
+ r1, r2, errno);
+
+ /*
+ * De-assign should always succeed, even if the corresponding assign
+ * failed.
+ */
+ kvm_irqfd(vm, GSI_BASE_PRIMARY, eventfd, KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN);
+ kvm_irqfd(vm, GSI_BASE_PRIMARY + 1, eventfd, KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ pthread_t racing_thread;
+ int r, i;
+
+ /* Create "full" VMs, as KVM_IRQFD requires an in-kernel IRQ chip. */
+ vm1 = vm_create(1);
+ vm2 = vm_create(1);
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(__eventfd, kvm_new_eventfd());
+
+ kvm_irqfd(vm1, 10, __eventfd, 0);
+
+ r = __kvm_irqfd(vm1, 11, __eventfd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r && errno == EBUSY,
+ "Wanted EBUSY, r = %d, errno = %d", r, errno);
+
+ r = __kvm_irqfd(vm2, 12, __eventfd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r && errno == EBUSY,
+ "Wanted EBUSY, r = %d, errno = %d", r, errno);
+
+ kvm_irqfd(vm1, 11, READ_ONCE(__eventfd), KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN);
+ kvm_irqfd(vm1, 12, READ_ONCE(__eventfd), KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN);
+ kvm_irqfd(vm1, 13, READ_ONCE(__eventfd), KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN);
+ kvm_irqfd(vm1, 14, READ_ONCE(__eventfd), KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN);
+ kvm_irqfd(vm1, 10, READ_ONCE(__eventfd), KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN);
+
+ close(__eventfd);
+
+ pthread_create(&racing_thread, NULL, secondary_irqfd_juggler, vm2);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(__eventfd, kvm_new_eventfd());
+
+ juggle_eventfd_primary(vm1, __eventfd);
+ juggle_eventfd_primary(vm2, __eventfd);
+ close(__eventfd);
+ }
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(done, true);
+ pthread_join(racing_thread, NULL);
+}
--
2.49.0.504.g3bcea36a83-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-01 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 20:44 [PATCH 00/12] KVM: Make irqfd registration globally unique Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: Use a local struct to do the initial vfs_poll() on an irqfd Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: Acquire SCRU lock outside of irqfds.lock during assignment Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: Initialize irqfd waitqueue callback when adding to the queue Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: Add irqfd to KVM's list via the vfs_poll() callback Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: Add irqfd to eventfd's waitqueue while holding irqfds.lock Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched/wait: Add a waitqueue helper for fully exclusive priority waiters Sean Christopherson
2025-04-02 18:40 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: Disallow binding multiple irqfds to an eventfd with a priority waiter Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched/wait: Drop WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from add_wait_queue_priority() Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: Drop sanity check that per-VM list of irqfds is unique Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: selftests: Assert that eventfd() succeeds in Xen shinfo test Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: selftests: Add utilities to create eventfds and do KVM_IRQFD Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250401204425.904001-13-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).