From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Eugen Hristev" <eugen.hristev@linaro.org>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
"Andreas Klinger" <ak@it-klinger.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] iio: adc: hx711: use struct with aligned_s64 timestamp
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:11:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250421121137.26e30217@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250418-iio-prefer-aligned_s64-timestamp-v1-3-4c6080710516@baylibre.com>
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:58:22 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Use a struct with aligned s64_timestamp instead of a padded array for
> the buffer used for iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(). This makes it easier
> to see the correctness of the size and alignment of the buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
This one is good and doesn't have the issue with moving timestamps.
Applied.
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c b/drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c
> index 8da0419ecfa3575aa54a93707c681ec8ced28be8..7235fa9e13d57c693751757c5d40e8a799622f17 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/hx711.c
> @@ -87,7 +87,10 @@ struct hx711_data {
> * triggered buffer
> * 2x32-bit channel + 64-bit naturally aligned timestamp
> */
> - u32 buffer[4] __aligned(8);
> + struct {
> + u32 channel[2];
> + aligned_s64 timestamp;
> + } buffer;
> /*
> * delay after a rising edge on SCK until the data is ready DOUT
> * this is dependent on the hx711 where the datasheet tells a
> @@ -361,15 +364,15 @@ static irqreturn_t hx711_trigger(int irq, void *p)
>
> mutex_lock(&hx711_data->lock);
>
> - memset(hx711_data->buffer, 0, sizeof(hx711_data->buffer));
> + memset(&hx711_data->buffer, 0, sizeof(hx711_data->buffer));
>
> iio_for_each_active_channel(indio_dev, i) {
> - hx711_data->buffer[j] = hx711_reset_read(hx711_data,
> + hx711_data->buffer.channel[j] = hx711_reset_read(hx711_data,
> indio_dev->channels[i].channel);
> j++;
> }
>
> - iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, hx711_data->buffer,
> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, &hx711_data->buffer,
> pf->timestamp);
>
> mutex_unlock(&hx711_data->lock);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-21 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-18 19:58 [PATCH 00/10] iio: prefer aligned_s64 timestamp (round 1) David Lechner
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 01/10] iio: accel: sca3300: use struct with aligned_s64 timestamp David Lechner
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 02/10] iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: " David Lechner
2025-04-21 11:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 03/10] iio: adc: hx711: " David Lechner
2025-04-21 11:11 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 04/10] iio: adc: mxs-lradc-adc: " David Lechner
2025-04-21 11:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-21 16:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 05/10] iio: adc: stm32-adc: " David Lechner
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 06/10] iio: adc: ti-adc0832: " David Lechner
2025-04-21 11:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] iio: adc: ti-adc12138: " David Lechner
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 08/10] iio: adc: ti-ads124s08: " David Lechner
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 09/10] iio: adc: ti-ads8688: " David Lechner
2025-04-18 19:58 ` [PATCH 10/10] iio: chemical: atlas-sensor: " David Lechner
2025-04-18 23:05 ` [PATCH 00/10] iio: prefer aligned_s64 timestamp (round 1) David Lechner
2025-04-21 11:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250421121137.26e30217@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@it-klinger.de \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=eugen.hristev@linaro.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox