linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Ruihan Li <lrh2000@pku.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region()
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:33:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423133821.789413-2-dwmw2@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423133821.789413-1-dwmw2@infradead.org>

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>

Especially since commit 9092d4f7a1f8 ("memblock: update initialization
of reserved pages"), the reserve_bootmem_region() function can spend a
significant amount of time iterating over every 4KiB PFN in a range,
calling pfn_valid() on each one, and ultimately doing absolutely nothing.

On a platform used for virtualization, with large NOMAP regions that
eventually get used for guest RAM, this leads to a significant increase
in steal time experienced during kexec for a live update.

Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region().
This implementation is precisely the same naïve loop that the function
used to have, but subsequent commits will provide optimised versions
for FLATMEM and SPARSEMEM, and this version will remain for those
architectures which provide their own pfn_valid() implementation,
until/unless they also provide a matching for_each_valid_pfn().

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++++++++++
 mm/mm_init.c           | 23 ++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 6ccec1bf2896..230a29c2ed1a 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -2177,6 +2177,16 @@ void sparse_init(void);
 #define subsection_map_init(_pfn, _nr_pages) do {} while (0)
 #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
 
+/*
+ * Fallback case for when the architecture provides its own pfn_valid() but
+ * not a corresponding for_each_valid_pfn().
+ */
+#ifndef for_each_valid_pfn
+#define for_each_valid_pfn(_pfn, _start_pfn, _end_pfn)			\
+	for ((_pfn) = (_start_pfn); (_pfn) < (_end_pfn); (_pfn)++)	\
+		if (pfn_valid(_pfn))
+#endif
+
 #endif /* !__GENERATING_BOUNDS.H */
 #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif /* _LINUX_MMZONE_H */
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
index 9659689b8ace..41884f2155c4 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.c
+++ b/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -777,22 +777,19 @@ static inline void init_deferred_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
 void __meminit reserve_bootmem_region(phys_addr_t start,
 				      phys_addr_t end, int nid)
 {
-	unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start);
-	unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_UP(end);
+	unsigned long pfn;
 
-	for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn++) {
-		if (pfn_valid(start_pfn)) {
-			struct page *page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
+	for_each_valid_pfn (pfn, PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(end)) {
+		struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
 
-			init_deferred_page(start_pfn, nid);
+		init_deferred_page(pfn, nid);
 
-			/*
-			 * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct
-			 * page is not visible yet so nobody should
-			 * access it yet.
-			 */
-			__SetPageReserved(page);
-		}
+		/*
+		 * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct
+		 * page is not visible yet so nobody should
+		 * access it yet.
+		 */
+		__SetPageReserved(page);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.49.0



  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-23 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-23 13:33 [PATCH v4 0/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 13:33 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2025-04-24 21:11   ` [PATCH v4 1/7] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Hildenbrand
2025-04-25 22:01     ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-28  7:06       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-23 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-24 21:13   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-23 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] mm, PM: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in kernel/power/snapshot.c David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] mm, x86: Use for_each_valid_pfn() from __ioremap_check_ram() David Woodhouse
2025-04-23 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] mm: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in memory_hotplug David Woodhouse
2025-04-24 21:15   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-23 13:33 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] mm/mm_init: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in init_unavailable_range() David Woodhouse
2025-04-25 16:11   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-25 23:38     ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-26  8:30       ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-27 23:07         ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-28  8:25           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-25 16:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-25 19:08     ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-25 20:12       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-25 20:36         ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-25 23:04         ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-28  7:12           ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250423133821.789413-2-dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lrh2000@pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).