From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F09C3ABA5 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:47:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eg9+kBMWvPedjZGNuy7bvcmP/WEsIuEspvyWucWbORw=; b=KSVluohLwrvLAV8Hha5sAPawR0 3UqnA0lx0bGE9soTabhk/fn4bHJ7/A4p+ZzA7yUHcJLc/SaXYZfcEQrIsxHmUO7EWfrejVMYyOO8/ XEY3+LtcqakoXpjs92UJkMwGD9+PA73QhVHwllCNGYZPVci/Jm1SdAu8clzSG6ldFXV2R9+qpxCL7 tzqsnvvql9s2DJ5/LunxEdI47NvwES3Mj8shee6t1JJPdSIR8nhioNIN53o1ycCgnZxurTt2Rb2J+ G6XqbqGcL1/fqFuD3i+hmc/WRDLBBowVj2YlapUWG/sMLnTblHPyTNe21UrxNpD4MUSt83vreNQLn bP2yu0zw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u9kN6-00000009gHg-0nVT; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:47:36 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u9kLB-00000009g1d-0EZ4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:45:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABC2614FE; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2485AC4CEEB; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:45:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745930736; bh=6+2F9d2vQJBN+qiFNCygGrCDiRttfJH3PpspPZdJpHo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=f83v9cDXKLb1VwZ/DAPpgaGXVtLDI+kpIKw5NMOzQ4qa6A5nicXNdkPDgTrtU/voo g5rBqU2eJq1Bo1J4jjqOWZAjueEC8rpxcJui3Ah1q6HjyJSoCs6H5pmDmiYD97MWQJ 58upXHW+LefVfSV0qnJCWAICk7A27SvEd4htO43DF/Z5aFxL2+zSaEAKRgXfVxQKd8 6ZqeZU8wVcMO0Stvx4aKB97s4Y2y4UvANw046gzyM8fYiu4Kc8y4KEUBir7/hhqX9L D6V4xZ30oNREaq9zY3/6ycZtGrGVMHSsk+bcXKZxDqaj8r4JMHJbegyNCv7gAbnkDv ZPLbRDCkqiNNA== Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:45:29 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Mark Rutland , Valentin Schneider , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , Peter Collingbourne , Thomas Gleixner , Neeraj Upadhyay , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Mark Brown , Kristina Martsenko , Petr Tesarik , Jinjie Ruan , Juri Lelli , Phil Auld Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: enable PREEMPT_LAZY Message-ID: <20250429124528.GA25752@willie-the-truck> References: <20250305104925.189198-1-vschneid@redhat.com> <20250305104925.189198-2-vschneid@redhat.com> <20250331090756.L7iXi1Ee@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250331090756.L7iXi1Ee@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:07:56AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2025-03-05 12:15:35 [+0000], Mark Rutland wrote: > > Catalin, Will, given this is small and self-contained, I reckon it makes > > sense to pick this up ahead of Jinjie's series to move arm64 over to the > > generic entry library (which is on my queue of things to review). Even > > if we pick up both, it'll be easier to bisect and debug issues caused by > > this patch alone. > > Any updates here? I know it is the merge window but I don't know if > upstream considers this or wants to sit on it until the generic entry > gets in. > In the meantime I stuff it into my RT tree so it does not get lost. Sorry for the delay; I'll pick this up in the arm64 tree today. Will