From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610EAC369DC for ; Thu, 1 May 2025 12:44:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jWfZgdsvHKEEM66vteqiVMN/kHVjVgzQe3JHcmrpCug=; b=TDLjhjtzk0YUpBErRZ1Vzx7Ovd AEJ+IQ16EJSqaSbEFMQ8y5Dewo3sVXC5ScmD6hFOOhwXYvuOVLUSLwOkMyxCHrb7A5J4XEuBBi6DJ 5k2OWv9VgmkpGxxwLJiQY/b1/emJ2fKb/tOBY3N/082ExjYcgw+pnDhqW+AotkcBtEpGzpsGL4X4G tTbH+GEjRW+pS/N361CmNV03RB2znLvQLlHqxzeYa3ORZWxESRAzKfYHEpJamjNWPNHwkZP1fN+gY M0bLB734LxwTcb3tQWFVN4li4cD6iQMnzAlaBSrrwtpOwsKiFuPYpBLIpwE07UEzt5Aabg4htXGTB ZISjqdZQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uATGX-0000000FimB-3pYV; Thu, 01 May 2025 12:43:49 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uASvf-0000000FZaq-3fBU for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 May 2025 12:22:17 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C169F1D14; Thu, 1 May 2025 05:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from donnerap.manchester.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12B663F673; Thu, 1 May 2025 05:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 13:22:11 +0100 From: Andre Przywara To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro Message-ID: <20250501132211.0310ae49@donnerap.manchester.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <174610166405.2974716.1586244113913047340.b4-ty@csie.org> References: <20250430095325.477311-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <174610166405.2974716.1586244113913047340.b4-ty@csie.org> Organization: ARM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250501_052215_962788_6C361052 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 1 May 2025 20:14:24 +0800 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: Hi, > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:53:25 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > > When introducing the SUNXI_CCU_MP_DATA_WITH_MUX_GATE_FEAT macro, the order > > of the last two arguments was different between the users and the > > definition: features became flags and flags became features. > > > > This just didn't end up in a desaster yet because most users ended up > > passing 0 for both arguments, and other clocks (for the new A523 SoC) are > > not yet used. > > > > [...] > > Applied to clk-fixes-for-6.15 in git@github.com:linux-sunxi/linux-sunxi.git, thanks! thanks for that, but the URL here is not correct, is it? Should be the kernel.org repo instead? Saw this already in other "applied" emails. Cheers, Andre > > [1/1] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro > commit: 4a9c3c3215491f25bc66d615faa921c814b1a479 > > Best regards,