From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, daniel.kiss@arm.com,
david.spickett@arm.com, luis.machado@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, richard.sandiford@arm.com,
sander.desmalen@arm.com, tabba@google.com, tamas.petz@arm.com,
tkjos@google.com, will@kernel.org, yury.khrustalev@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 24/24] kselftest/arm64: fp-ptrace: Adjust to new inactive mode behaviour
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 14:26:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250508132644.1395904-25-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508132644.1395904-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
In order to fix an ABI problem, we recently changed the way that reads
of the NT_ARM_SVE and NT_ARM_SSVE regsets behave when their
corresponding vector state is inactive.
Update the fp-ptrace test for the new behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: David Spickett <david.spickett@arm.com>
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c | 30 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c
index c2882a5a5cc0a..191c47ca0ed80 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c
@@ -439,10 +439,17 @@ static bool check_ptrace_values_sve(pid_t child, struct test_config *config)
pass = false;
}
- if (sve->size != SVE_PT_SIZE(vq, sve->flags)) {
- ksft_print_msg("Mismatch in SVE header size: %d != %lu\n",
- sve->size, SVE_PT_SIZE(vq, sve->flags));
- pass = false;
+ if (svcr_in & SVCR_SM) {
+ if (sve->size != sizeof(sve)) {
+ ksft_print_msg("NT_ARM_SVE reports data with PSTATE.SM\n");
+ pass = false;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (sve->size != SVE_PT_SIZE(vq, sve->flags)) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Mismatch in SVE header size: %d != %lu\n",
+ sve->size, SVE_PT_SIZE(vq, sve->flags));
+ pass = false;
+ }
}
/* The registers might be in completely different formats! */
@@ -515,10 +522,17 @@ static bool check_ptrace_values_ssve(pid_t child, struct test_config *config)
pass = false;
}
- if (sve->size != SVE_PT_SIZE(vq, sve->flags)) {
- ksft_print_msg("Mismatch in SSVE header size: %d != %lu\n",
- sve->size, SVE_PT_SIZE(vq, sve->flags));
- pass = false;
+ if (!(svcr_in & SVCR_SM)) {
+ if (sve->size != sizeof(sve)) {
+ ksft_print_msg("NT_ARM_SSVE reports data without PSTATE.SM\n");
+ pass = false;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (sve->size != SVE_PT_SIZE(vq, sve->flags)) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Mismatch in SSVE header size: %d != %lu\n",
+ sve->size, SVE_PT_SIZE(vq, sve->flags));
+ pass = false;
+ }
}
/* The registers might be in completely different formats! */
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 13:26 [PATCH v2 00/24] arm64: FPSIMD/SVE/SME fixes + re-enable SME Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] arm64/fpsimd: Do not discard modified SVE state Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 15:02 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] arm64/fpsimd: signal: Clear PSTATE.SM when restoring FPSIMD frame only Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] arm64/fpsimd: signal: Mandate SVE payload for streaming-mode state Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] arm64/fpsimd: signal: Consistently read FPSIMD context Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 14:34 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Consistently handle partial writes to NT_ARM_(S)SVE Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] arm64/fpsimd: Clarify sve_sync_*() functions Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] arm64/fpsimd: Factor out {sve,sme}_state_size() helpers Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] arm64/fpsimd: Add task_smstop_sm() Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] arm64/fpsimd: signal: Use SMSTOP behaviour in setup_return() Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] arm64/fpsimd: Remove redundant task->mm check Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] arm64/fpsimd: Consistently preserve FPSIMD state during clone() Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] arm64/fpsimd: Clear PSTATE.SM " Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] arm64/fpsimd: Make clone() compatible with ZA lazy saving Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace/prctl: Ensure VL changes do not resurrect stale data Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace/prctl: Ensure VL changes leave task in a valid state Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Save task state before generating SVE header Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Do not present register data for inactive mode Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Mandate SVE payload for streaming-mode state Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Gracefully handle errors Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] arm64/fpsimd: Allow CONFIG_ARM64_SME to be selected Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] kselftest/arm64: fp-ptrace: Fix expected FPMR value when PSTATE.SM is changed Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] kselftest/arm64: tpidr2: Adjust to new clone() behaviour Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] kselftest/arm64: fp-ptrace: Adjust to new VL change behaviour Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 13:26 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2025-05-08 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] arm64: FPSIMD/SVE/SME fixes + re-enable SME Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250508132644.1395904-25-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
--cc=david.spickett@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=sander.desmalen@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=tamas.petz@arm.com \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.khrustalev@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).