linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>
To: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/7] efi: Add missing static initializer for efi_mm::cpus_allowed_lock
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 19:43:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250514174339.1834871-10-ardb+git@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514174339.1834871-9-ardb+git@google.com>

From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

Initialize the cpus_allowed_lock struct member of efi_mm.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
index 7309394b8fc9..59a56661937c 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
 	.page_table_lock	= __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(efi_mm.page_table_lock),
 	.mmlist			= LIST_HEAD_INIT(efi_mm.mmlist),
 	.cpu_bitmap		= { [BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)] = 0},
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID
+	.cpus_allowed_lock	= __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(efi_mm.cpus_allowed_lock),
+#endif
 };
 
 struct workqueue_struct *efi_rts_wq;
-- 
2.49.0.1101.gccaa498523-goog



  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-14 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-14 17:43 [RFC PATCH 0/7] arm64: Make EFI calls preemptible Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] efi/runtime: Return success/failure from arch_efi_call_virt_setup() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] efi/runtime: Deal with arch_efi_call_virt_setup() returning failure Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] arm64/fpsimd: Don't warn when EFI execution context is preemptible Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] arm64/efi: Use a semaphore to protect the EFI stack and FP/SIMD state Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] arm64/efi: Move uaccess en/disable out of efi_set_pgd() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-11 13:41   ` Will Deacon
2025-07-14  6:38     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] arm64/efi: Call EFI runtime services without disabling preemption Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-11 13:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14  2:20     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-14 10:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-15  0:46         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-11 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] arm64: Make EFI calls preemptible Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250514174339.1834871-10-ardb+git@google.com \
    --to=ardb+git@google.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).