linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	will@kernel.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, code@tyhicks.com,
	eahariha@linux.microsoft.com, vijayb@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm-smmu: select suitable IOVA
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 16:07:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250525190703.GD12328@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520224224.GA16365@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 03:42:24PM -0700, Shyam Saini wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> apologies for the delayed response.
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:04:27AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > 
> > > Per last discussion "SMMU driver have a list of potential addresses and
> > > select the first one that does not intersect with the non-working IOVA
> > > ranges.". If we don't know what the "non-working IOVA" is, how do we
> > > know it does not intersect the "potential addresses"?
> > 
> > I had understood from previous discussions that this platform is
> > properly creating IOMMU_RESV_RESERVED regions for the IOVA that
> > doesn't work. Otherwise everything is broken..
> > 
> > Presumably that happens through iommu_dma_get_resv_regions() calling
> > of_iommu_get_resv_regions() on a DT platform. There is a schema
> > describing how to do this, so platform firmware should be able to do it..
> > 
> > So the fix seems trivial enough to me:
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > index b4c21aaed1266a..ebba18579151bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -3562,17 +3562,29 @@ static int arm_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,
> >  static void arm_smmu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev,
> >  				      struct list_head *head)
> >  {
> > -	struct iommu_resv_region *region;
> > -	int prot = IOMMU_WRITE | IOMMU_NOEXEC | IOMMU_MMIO;
> > -
> > -	region = iommu_alloc_resv_region(MSI_IOVA_BASE, MSI_IOVA_LENGTH,
> > -					 prot, IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!region)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	list_add_tail(&region->list, head);
> > +	static const u64 msi_bases[] = { MSI_IOVA_BASE, 0x12340000 };
> >  
> >  	iommu_dma_get_resv_regions(dev, head);
> 
> my understand is, this hook is not called for all the devices, eg: pcie dts node
> doesn't use [1] "iommus" property instead it uses "iommu-map" property
> as a consequence, [1] while loop exits prematurely and iommu_dma_get_resv_regions()
> is not called, so there is no IOVA reservation for the pcie device. 

I can't really understand this sentance.

The above is the only place that creates a IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI so it is
definately called and used, right? If not where does your
IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI come from?

This function is also the only thing that computes the reserved ranges
that iommu_get_resv_regions() returns.

As above, I've asked a few times now if your resv_regions() is
correct, meaning there is a reserved range covering the address space
that doesn't have working translation. That means
iommu_get_resv_regions() returns such a range.

If you don't have that then you have a bigger platform problem, IMHO,
as vfio/iommufd only respect reserved ranges.

Otherwise, what is the issue you see, exactly? Did you even try it?

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-25 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 22:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm-smmu: select suitable IOVA Shyam Saini
2025-04-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm-smmu: move MSI_IOVA macro definitions Shyam Saini
2025-04-11 23:28   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-12  3:17   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: iommu: add "arm,smmu-faulty-msi-iova" property Shyam Saini
2025-04-10 22:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm-smmu: select suitable MSI IOVA Shyam Saini
2025-04-11 23:40   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-10 23:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm-smmu: select suitable IOVA Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-16 18:04   ` Jacob Pan
     [not found]   ` <67fff12d.650a0220.208c7c.d69dSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2025-04-16 18:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-16 21:34       ` Jacob Pan
2025-05-20 22:42       ` Shyam Saini
2025-05-25 19:07         ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-05-27 20:54           ` Shyam Saini
2025-05-28  0:04             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-28 22:42               ` Jacob Pan
     [not found]               ` <68379171.170a0220.191ee0.8d6bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2025-05-29  0:38                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-29 18:22               ` Shyam Saini
2025-05-29 18:38                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-29 22:08                   ` Shyam Saini
2025-05-30 13:13                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-30 21:30                       ` Shyam Saini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250525190703.GD12328@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=code@tyhicks.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eahariha@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=shyamsaini@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=vijayb@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).