From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/13] crypto: s390/sha256 - implement library instead of shash
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 11:05:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529110526.6d2959a9.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250428170040.423825-9-ebiggers@kernel.org>
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:00:33 -0700
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> Instead of providing crypto_shash algorithms for the arch-optimized
> SHA-256 code, instead implement the SHA-256 library. This is much
> simpler, it makes the SHA-256 library functions be arch-optimized, and
> it fixes the longstanding issue where the arch-optimized SHA-256 was
> disabled by default. SHA-256 still remains available through
> crypto_shash, but individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
I can get to the following error after this patch, now merged as commit
b9eac03edcf8 ("crypto: s390/sha256 - implement library instead of shash"):
error: the following would cause module name conflict:
crypto/sha256.ko
arch/s390/lib/crypto/sha256.ko
Base config file is generated from:
$ CONFIG=$(mktemp)
$ cat << EOF > $CONFIG
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=m
EOF
Base config applied to allnoconfig:
$ KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=$CONFIG make ARCH=s390 CROSS_COMPILE=s390x-linux-gnu- allnoconfig
Resulting in:
$ grep SHA256 .config
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_SHA256=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256_GENERIC=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256_S390=m
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 17:00 [PATCH v4 00/13] Architecture-optimized SHA-256 library API Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] crypto: sha256 - support arch-optimized lib and expose through shash Eric Biggers
2025-04-30 3:48 ` Herbert Xu
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] crypto: arm/sha256 - implement library instead of shash Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] crypto: arm64/sha256 - remove obsolete chunking logic Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] crypto: arm64/sha256 - implement library instead of shash Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] crypto: mips/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] crypto: powerpc/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] crypto: riscv/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-05-08 17:45 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2025-05-08 18:06 ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] crypto: s390/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 17:05 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2025-05-29 17:37 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 19:00 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 20:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-29 21:16 ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 23:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-30 0:18 ` Eric Biggers
2025-06-01 23:00 ` Eric Biggers
2025-06-02 14:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] crypto: sparc - move opcodes.h into asm directory Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] crypto: sparc/sha256 - implement library instead of shash Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] crypto: x86/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] crypto: sha256 - remove sha256_base.h Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] crypto: lib/sha256 - improve function prototypes Eric Biggers
2025-05-05 12:24 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Architecture-optimized SHA-256 library API Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250529110526.6d2959a9.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).