linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mikołaj Lenczewski" <miko.lenczewski@arm.com>
To: ryan.roberts@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	jean-philippe@linaro.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	baohua@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, david@redhat.com,
	jgg@ziepe.ca, nicolinc@nvidia.com, jsnitsel@redhat.com,
	mshavit@google.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: "Mikołaj Lenczewski" <miko.lenczewski@arm.com>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: cpufeature: Introduce MATCH_ALL_EARLY_CPUS capability type
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 09:51:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250617095104.6772-2-miko.lenczewski@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250617095104.6772-1-miko.lenczewski@arm.com>

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

For system-wide capabilities, the kernel has the SCOPE_SYSTEM type. Such
capabilities are checked once the SMP boot has completed using the
sanitised ID registers. However, there is a need for a new capability
type similar in scope to the system one but with checking performed
locally on each CPU during boot (e.g. based on MIDR_EL1 which is not a
sanitised register).

Introduce ARM64_CPUCAP_MATCH_ALL_EARLY_CPUS which, together with
ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU, ensures that such capability is enabled
only if all early CPUs have it. For ease of use, define
ARM64_CPUCAP_EARLY_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE which combines SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU,
PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPUS and MATCH_ALL_EARLY_CPUS.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikołaj Lenczewski <miko.lenczewski@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 23 +++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index c4326f1cb917..155ebd040c55 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -275,6 +275,14 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
 #define ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU	((u16)BIT(5))
 /* Panic when a conflict is detected */
 #define ARM64_CPUCAP_PANIC_ON_CONFLICT		((u16)BIT(6))
+/*
+ * When paired with SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU, all early CPUs must satisfy the
+ * condition. This is different from SCOPE_SYSTEM where the check is performed
+ * only once at the end of the SMP boot on the sanitised ID registers.
+ * SCOPE_SYSTEM is not suitable for cases where the capability depends on
+ * properties local to a CPU like MIDR_EL1.
+ */
+#define ARM64_CPUCAP_MATCH_ALL_EARLY_CPUS	((u16)BIT(7))
 
 /*
  * CPU errata workarounds that need to be enabled at boot time if one or
@@ -304,6 +312,16 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
 	(ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU		|	\
 	 ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU	|	\
 	 ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU)
+/*
+ * CPU feature detected at boot time and present on all early CPUs. Late CPUs
+ * are permitted to have the feature even if it hasn't been enabled, although
+ * the feature will not be used by Linux in this case. If all early CPUs have
+ * the feature, then every late CPU must have it.
+ */
+#define ARM64_CPUCAP_EARLY_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE		\
+	 (ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU		|	\
+	  ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU	|	\
+	  ARM64_CPUCAP_MATCH_ALL_EARLY_CPUS)
 
 /*
  * CPU feature detected at boot time, on one or more CPUs. A late CPU
@@ -391,6 +409,11 @@ static inline int cpucap_default_scope(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
 	return cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_MASK;
 }
 
+static inline bool cpucap_match_all_early_cpus(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
+{
+	return cap->type & ARM64_CPUCAP_MATCH_ALL_EARLY_CPUS;
+}
+
 /*
  * Generic helper for handling capabilities with multiple (match,enable) pairs
  * of call backs, sharing the same capability bit.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index b34044e20128..f9c947166322 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -3370,18 +3370,49 @@ static void update_cpu_capabilities(u16 scope_mask)
 
 	scope_mask &= ARM64_CPUCAP_SCOPE_MASK;
 	for (i = 0; i < ARM64_NCAPS; i++) {
+		bool match_all = false;
+		bool caps_set = false;
+		bool boot_cpu = false;
+
 		caps = cpucap_ptrs[i];
-		if (!caps || !(caps->type & scope_mask) ||
-		    cpus_have_cap(caps->capability) ||
-		    !caps->matches(caps, cpucap_default_scope(caps)))
+		if (!caps || !(caps->type & scope_mask))
 			continue;
 
-		if (caps->desc && !caps->cpus)
+		match_all = cpucap_match_all_early_cpus(caps);
+		caps_set = cpus_have_cap(caps->capability);
+		boot_cpu = scope_mask & SCOPE_BOOT_CPU;
+
+		/*
+		 * Unless it's a match-all CPUs feature, avoid probing if
+		 * already detected.
+		 */
+		if (!match_all && caps_set)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * A match-all CPUs capability is only set when probing the
+		 * boot CPU. It may be cleared subsequently if not detected on
+		 * secondary ones.
+		 */
+		if (match_all && !caps_set && !boot_cpu)
+			continue;
+
+		if (!caps->matches(caps, cpucap_default_scope(caps))) {
+			if (match_all)
+				__clear_bit(caps->capability, system_cpucaps);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Match-all CPUs capabilities are logged later when the
+		 * system capabilities are finalised.
+		 */
+		if (!match_all && caps->desc && !caps->cpus)
 			pr_info("detected: %s\n", caps->desc);
 
 		__set_bit(caps->capability, system_cpucaps);
 
-		if ((scope_mask & SCOPE_BOOT_CPU) && (caps->type & SCOPE_BOOT_CPU))
+		if (boot_cpu && (caps->type & SCOPE_BOOT_CPU))
 			set_bit(caps->capability, boot_cpucaps);
 	}
 }
@@ -3782,17 +3813,24 @@ static void __init setup_system_capabilities(void)
 	enable_cpu_capabilities(SCOPE_ALL & ~SCOPE_BOOT_CPU);
 	apply_alternatives_all();
 
-	/*
-	 * Log any cpucaps with a cpumask as these aren't logged by
-	 * update_cpu_capabilities().
-	 */
 	for (int i = 0; i < ARM64_NCAPS; i++) {
 		const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = cpucap_ptrs[i];
 
-		if (caps && caps->cpus && caps->desc &&
-			cpumask_any(caps->cpus) < nr_cpu_ids)
+		if (!caps || !caps->desc)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Log any cpucaps with a cpumask as these aren't logged by
+		 * update_cpu_capabilities().
+		 */
+		if (caps->cpus && cpumask_any(caps->cpus) < nr_cpu_ids)
 			pr_info("detected: %s on CPU%*pbl\n",
 				caps->desc, cpumask_pr_args(caps->cpus));
+
+		/* Log match-all CPUs capabilities */
+		if (cpucap_match_all_early_cpus(caps) &&
+		    cpus_have_cap(caps->capability))
+			pr_info("detected: %s\n", caps->desc);
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.49.0



  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-17 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-17  9:51 [PATCH v7 0/4] Initial BBML2 support for contpte_convert() Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-17  9:51 ` Mikołaj Lenczewski [this message]
2025-06-17 10:20   ` [PATCH v7 1/4] arm64: cpufeature: Introduce MATCH_ALL_EARLY_CPUS capability type Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-17  9:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: Add BBM Level 2 cpu feature Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-17 10:35   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-18 14:07   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-19  8:57     ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19  9:20       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-19 11:51         ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19 11:05   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-19 11:51     ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19 13:46       ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-19 14:46         ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-17  9:51 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] iommu/arm: Add BBM Level 2 smmu feature Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19 11:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-17  9:51 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] arm64/mm: Elide tlbi in contpte_convert() under BBML2 Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-06-19 19:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-19 19:47     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-06-20 16:10     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-25 13:07       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-25 13:37         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-25 14:16           ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250617095104.6772-2-miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
    --to=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).