From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DC65C7115B for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 05:13:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=oqhNWYJcnnLWhHm+EU+eEhxl9YLxgdkBjlZ5xMTxYGU=; b=UTnsBG2BNNAD/C7lY5zPnvXJC5 CVVLd1gkie4Rgn0a/UmMWtP70QHo/wUPHAflryKSHdjb3CQLqWGOEz4/5Cy4yU4rp0lu+xBZAhzYZ lrHv4tJMQNGmkV406PL6Kx+6fQOpGvA5CDEUFe6tqqbwGphi29p46/5G8BDJPHlSIzyMNCaL+acsa tvY6pi6klYzdvrN8teYVjFrZykOQJ4j28g5S2R2tDHt9n3iY0pUFqgTlMcK5lFkPwGo+EIlQK06z9 tdj8LrQt2ZGsCRf0i40ZMxdub6z43n3ybBBcuJgIwkh3HyI5tkTpepW/nffmr0R+g+bbShTzqZO4p 7Ct4jF7w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uSU3j-0000000Ellq-0GVO; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 05:13:03 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uSU1U-0000000Elbu-2OwJ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 05:10:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991E45C695C; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 05:08:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2586FC4CEED; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 05:10:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1750396242; bh=3Owcc1dRQY1Z8F1XG3Fhvz1hyBv+3yD4Obr3vbxaSeU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AwXhW/3dW4NobnXVrDnuTj9sJWvpONnO6e13RC1b8v30Q5BZHyA5X3ixaqY+vERJb nr0Zh0vWuZwid66smDuNUlz+GLmutwxaZze2SOUG5oh8nwy/AJTCVGfwt0fp72Yt9Q U9MjBGLTf5narKknvYW6atYjvPurd6V4NfTaM6CU= Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 07:10:39 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sean Anderson Cc: Radhey Shyam Pandey , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , Saravana Kannan , Leon Romanovsky , Dave Ertman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Danilo Krummrich , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] net: axienet: Fix deferred probe loop Message-ID: <2025062004-sandblast-overjoyed-6fe9@gregkh> References: <20250619200537.260017-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250619200537.260017-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250619_221044_652581_0E44FDB5 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.23 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 04:05:33PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote: > Upon further investigation, the EPROBE_DEFER loop outlined in [1] can > occur even without the PCS subsystem, as described in patch 4/4. The > second patch is a general fix, and could be applied even without the > auxdev conversion. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250610183459.3395328-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev/ I have no idea what this summary means at all, which isn't a good start to a patch series :( What problem are you trying to solve? What overall solution did you come up with? Who is supposed to be reviewing any of this? totally confused, greg k-h