Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: power_control: Set SCMI_SYSPOWER_IDLE in pm resume

Peng Fan
2025-07-01T15:41:40Z

Hi Sudeep,

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:58:07PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 11:21:52AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 01:23:10AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Just to summarise my understanding here at very high level, the issue
>>> > exists as the second notification by an agent to the Linux to suspend
>>> > the system wakes up the system from suspend state. Since the
>>> > interrupts are enabled before the thaw_processes() (which eventually
>>> > continues the execution of scmi_suspend_work_func() to set the state
>>> > to SCMI_SYSPOWER_IDLE, the scmi_userspace_notifier() is executed
>>> > much before and ends up ignoring the request as the state is still not
>>> > set to SCMI_SYSPOWER_IDLE. There is a race which your patch is
>>> > addressing.
>>>
>>> Thanks for writing this down, It is very correct and clear.
>>>
>>
>>While I am not against adding bus PM ops as it can be useful elsewhere,
>>just wonder if this usecase is a good use of it. Does setting the state
>>before the pm_suspend() call suffice. I still need to think through the
>>possible race with that solution, but just asking you to check if that
>
>There is race condition if setting the state to SCMI_SYSPOWER_IDLE before
>pm_suspend.
>
>The 2nd suspend notification could runs into pm_suspend again
>before pm_suspend update system_state to SYSTEM_SUSPEND, if my understanding
>is correct.
>
>Per pm_suspend->enter_state,
>"Make sure that no one else is trying to put the system into a sleep state",
>not sure, but I think better not let pm_suspend to handle the race condition.
>
>Since syspower only has one per system(linux), the other approach is to
>use syscore, but need a global variable for state in scmi_power_control.c,
>because syscore_suspend/resume does not have parameter.
>
>we need to set state back to IDLE after linux wakeup and before kernel
>thread scheduling. I only see two interfaces to achieve:
>PM ops or syscore ops.

Not sure you have time to give a look. I plan to post V2 later this
week. In V2, I would still use pm ops.

Thanks,
Peng

>
>Thanks,
>Peng
>
>
>>helps.
>>
>>--
>>Regards,
>>Sudeep