From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C37C77B7C for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:02:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=In8xSVodpg/2gOBaNjKny0YtfnUlx40SwXT9GJk2ZlQ=; b=liPSmnfcF8EdQ0IaB3fwMuvUkJ 3VWApxc5s8g5VtqUHHNYmosSlq45egRy7C9IHXipn1xQ2vFyCTH8h7Pn0tys/2ogAoLHWRFikVGYM 0TaskViboa4wop6+Nuhkn6kmM3yDY88IfmVastwHr9fQ5Hyf4ppkLEbmIphiS0Vz/0t0vN/LzXieS vxsGC0fZ5urX++ZLq54MT6ltZ25mWS/8NMzSkc2waOMn6a1z+YzRbG+o6BGG9b72Ln2R2Xe+JV8+9 HmSACJruGROW+G0RQG/8up+gn4X6VF18zXuRewCMGF1luRDgC0KkAvzwwib5xG6C6RNjCNK177MIa 2zAXbcWw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uU1QC-00000005Nt6-0AKi; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:02:36 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:45d1:ec00::3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uU0qg-00000005Ijb-2nbM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:25:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA9CA50D08; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD138C4CEE3; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:25:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1750760753; bh=vDay8J81ygLKIuI2jhCI+PZX+/fJvYJhHaZQbh7hB0Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OY8yIRNrKURFBHI24oxv/Y4MkVwLHUwknjWnTwnY+btkJL+9yAOKyPnB7xO8zTsA8 lCyPMIfQWmwJO0qKXxMS14x4JsMNhRXbhy1hJnKd4OhfhhLr9+URrADU3M81OyunjA WOJV4QVGRSVgI0LWOFjiPciBBixnH6IIQGZSvRhI= Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:25:49 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , Russell King , Linux ARM , Andy Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/222] 5.4.295-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025062425-waggle-jaybird-ef83@gregkh> References: <20250623130611.896514667@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250624_032554_838855_3D3F561B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 12:46:15AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 18:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.295 release. > > There are 222 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:05:50 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.295-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Regressions on arm defconfig builds with gcc-12 and clang failed on > the Linux stable-rc 5.4.295-rc1. > > Regressions found on arm > * arm, build > - clang-20-axm55xx_defconfig > - clang-20-defconfig > - clang-20-lkftconfig > - clang-20-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag > - clang-nightly-axm55xx_defconfig > - clang-nightly-defconfig > - clang-nightly-lkftconfig > - gcc-12-axm55xx_defconfig > - gcc-12-defconfig > - gcc-12-lkftconfig > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-kasan > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-libgpiod > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-perf > - gcc-12-lkftconfig-rcutorture > - gcc-8-axm55xx_defconfig > - gcc-8-defconfig > > Regression Analysis: > - New regression? Yes > - Reproducibility? Yes > > Build regression: stable-rc 5.4.295-rc1 arm kvm init.S Error selected > processor does not support `eret' in ARM mode > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > > > ## Build errors > arch/arm/kvm/init.S: Assembler messages: > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:109: Error: selected processor does not support > `eret' in ARM mode > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:116: Error: Banked registers are not available > with this architecture. -- `msr ELR_hyp,r1' > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:145: Error: selected processor does not support > `eret' in ARM mode > arch/arm/kvm/init.S:149: Error: selected processor does not support > `eret' in ARM mode > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:345: arch/arm/kvm/init.o] Error 1 > > and > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:45: Error: selected processor does not support `smc > #0' in ARM mode > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:94: Error: selected processor does not support `smc > #0' in ARM mode > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:160: Error: selected processor does not support `smc > #0' in ARM mode > /tmp/cc0RDxs9.s:296: Error: selected processor does not support `smc > #0' in ARM mode > make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:262: > drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-32.o] Error 1 That's odd, both clang and gcc don't like this? Any chance you can do 'git bisect' to track down the offending commit? thanks, greg k-h