From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
peterx@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
baohua@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Optimize mprotect() for large folios
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 17:04:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250628113435.46678-1-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)
This patchset optimizes the mprotect() system call for large folios
by PTE-batching. No issues were observed with mm-selftests, build
tested on x86_64.
We use the following test cases to measure performance, mprotect()'ing
the mapped memory to read-only then read-write 40 times:
Test case 1: Mapping 1G of memory, touching it to get PMD-THPs, then
pte-mapping those THPs
Test case 2: Mapping 1G of memory with 64K mTHPs
Test case 3: Mapping 1G of memory with 4K pages
Average execution time on arm64, Apple M3:
Before the patchset:
T1: 7.9 seconds T2: 7.9 seconds T3: 4.2 seconds
After the patchset:
T1: 2.1 seconds T2: 2.2 seconds T3: 4.3 seconds
Observing T1/T2 and T3 before the patchset, we also remove the regression
introduced by ptep_get() on a contpte block. And, for large folios we get
an almost 74% performance improvement, albeit the trade-off being a slight
degradation in the small folio case.
Here is the test program:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define SIZE (1024*1024*1024)
unsigned long pmdsize = (1UL << 21);
unsigned long pagesize = (1UL << 12);
static void pte_map_thps(char *mem, size_t size)
{
size_t offs;
int ret = 0;
/* PTE-map each THP by temporarily splitting the VMAs. */
for (offs = 0; offs < size; offs += pmdsize) {
ret |= madvise(mem + offs, pagesize, MADV_DONTFORK);
ret |= madvise(mem + offs, pagesize, MADV_DOFORK);
}
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: mprotect() failed\n");
exit(1);
}
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char *p;
int ret = 0;
p = mmap((1UL << 30), SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
if (p != (1UL << 30)) {
perror("mmap");
return 1;
}
memset(p, 0, SIZE);
if (madvise(p, SIZE, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE))
perror("madvise");
explicit_bzero(p, SIZE);
pte_map_thps(p, SIZE);
for (int loops = 0; loops < 40; loops++) {
if (mprotect(p, SIZE, PROT_READ))
perror("mprotect"), exit(1);
if (mprotect(p, SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE))
perror("mprotect"), exit(1);
explicit_bzero(p, SIZE);
}
}
---
The patchset is rebased onto Saturday's mm-new.
v3->v4:
- Refactor skipping logic into a new function, edit patch 1 subject
to highlight it is only for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA case (David H)
- Refactor the optimization logic, add more documentation to the generic
batched functions, do not add clear_flush_ptes, squash patch 4
and 5 (Ryan)
v2->v3:
- Add comments for the new APIs (Ryan, Lorenzo)
- Instead of refactoring, use a "skip_batch" label
- Move arm64 patches at the end (Ryan)
- In can_change_pte_writable(), check AnonExclusive page-by-page (David H)
- Resolve implicit declaration; tested build on x86 (Lance Yang)
v1->v2:
- Rebase onto mm-unstable (6ebffe676fcf: util_macros.h: make the header more resilient)
- Abridge the anon-exclusive condition (Lance Yang)
Dev Jain (4):
mm: Optimize mprotect() for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA by batch-skipping PTEs
mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit
mm: Optimize mprotect() by PTE-batching
arm64: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 10 ++
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 28 +++-
include/linux/pgtable.h | 83 +++++++++-
mm/mprotect.c | 269 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
4 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-28 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-28 11:34 Dev Jain [this message]
2025-06-28 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: Optimize mprotect() for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-06-30 9:42 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 9:49 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 9:55 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 10:05 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:40 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:56 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 9:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-02 15:01 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 15:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-28 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 10:17 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:35 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 10:42 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 12:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 4:44 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 7:33 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:06 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 8:23 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-28 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: Optimize mprotect() by PTE-batching Dev Jain
2025-06-28 12:39 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:21 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:47 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:50 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:53 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 5:47 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 7:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 12:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 5:30 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 8:03 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:06 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 8:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 8:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 9:53 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 10:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 11:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 13:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-02 10:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-02 15:03 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 15:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-03 12:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-28 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:43 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-29 23:05 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Optimize mprotect() for large folios Andrew Morton
2025-06-30 3:33 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:45 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:22 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:17 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:25 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:43 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250628113435.46678-1-dev.jain@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).