From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
To: Carlos Song <carlos.song@nxp.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: "mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
"sboyd@kernel.org" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"pavel@kernel.org" <pavel@kernel.org>,
"len.brown@intel.com" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"dakr@kernel.org" <dakr@kernel.org>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>,
"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bough Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>, Jun Li <jun.li@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: Dead lock with clock global prepare_lock mutex and device's power.runtime_status
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 18:58:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250707105816.GF11488@nxa18884-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI2PR04MB11147CCEFE4204B852807AAF2E841A@VI2PR04MB11147.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
+Ulf
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 03:16:08AM +0000, Carlos Song wrote:
>Hi, All:
>
>We met the dead lock issue recently and think it should be common issue and not sure how to fix it.
>
>We use gpio-gate-clock clock provider (drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c), gpio is one of i2c gpio expander (drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c). Our i2c driver enable run time pm (drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c [1]). System random blocked when at reboot.
>
>The dead lock happen as below call stacks
>
>Task 117 Task 120
>
>schedule()
>clk_prepare_lock()--> wait prepare_lock(mutex_lock) schedule() wait for power.runtime_status exit RPM_SUSPENDING
> ^^^^ A ^^^^ B
>clk_bulk_unprepare() rpm_resume()
>lpi2c_runtime_suspend() pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
>... lpi2c_imx_xfer()
> ...
>rpm_suspend() set RPM_SUSPENDING pcf857x_set();
> ^^^^ B ...
> clk_prepare_lock() --> hold prepare_lock
> ^^^^ A
> ...
>
This is a common issue that clk use a big prepare lock which is easy
to trigger dead lock with runtime pm. I recalled that pengutronix raised
this, but could not find the information.
In this case, there are two clock providers that are independent.
So I think using one global prepare lock does not make sense here.
Stephen,
I propose using a per provider prepare lock if the providers are
totally independent. How do you think?
Thanks,
Peng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-07 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 3:16 Dead lock with clock global prepare_lock mutex and device's power.runtime_status Carlos Song
2025-07-07 10:58 ` Peng Fan [this message]
2025-07-07 10:36 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-07-07 17:28 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-07-22 9:14 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250707105816.GF11488@nxa18884-linux \
--to=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=carlos.song@nxp.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jun.li@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox